Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:09, Bill Day wrote: > or if its winders you wont be able to read them at all 8-) > > suggestion, for windows the mozilla 1.0 release is fairly stable... jsut > dont let M$ fight over who is default set miozilla as the default and > leave it at that... > > > Bill Day No

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:38, Tim Wunder wrote: > On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:11 am, Keith Antoine wrote: > > Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now > > you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all. > > Using KMail: > View-Inlined Attachments sh

Rant......

2002-09-17 Thread mpdickens
I have a RANT: I gotta tell ya: Here I am, at http://www.ibiblio.org webpage that contains just about all of the linux distro's that are available... I'm reading the various descriptions of the distros. I come to the Debian description and it states: "Debian is kernel independent. It currently u

Re: search engine swish-e

2002-09-17 Thread m.w.chang
I don't know whether it bkocked you before. the "exclude hostname" issue - that a site could be accessed from multiple domain names. Will namazu be able to handle it with basic setup? not for htdig. you need to well-versed in url_part_aliases. and there is no enough examples in her website. th

unreal tournamnet 2003 for linux (demo)

2002-09-17 Thread m.w.chang
saw it in freshmeat.net, a gentoo-based setup. anyone tried it? :) -- Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust. / v \ news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org ^ ^ __

Re: Debian question: Package names

2002-09-17 Thread Leon A. Goldstein
Joel Hammer wrote: > I added this line to my sources.list file: > deb http://download.at.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.0.3/Debian/ ./ > I want to get kde 3.0.3 on my libranet 2.0 system. > Just using adminmenu and kde says I have the most recent. (2.2.2). > However, when I run adminmenu, I don't get th

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Bill Day
or if its winders you wont be able to read them at all 8-) suggestion, for windows the mozilla 1.0 release is fairly stable... jsut dont let M$ fight over who is default set miozilla as the default and leave it at that... Bill Day Linux 2.2.20-1tr i586 6:10am up 12 days, 23:34, 0 users

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Keith Antoine spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:30, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now > you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text a

Re: search engine swish-e

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > what namazu better than htdig, other than the start_url thing? IIRC, it handles more character sets, more document types, allows you to have multiple document repository inputs into one sea

Re: SuSe

2002-09-17 Thread Ben Duncan
Yup .. got my early release order in to .. Privilages I guess of having a registered Professional version ... dep wrote: > begin Lee's quote: > | Just got advanced notice from SuSE; 8.1 will be out Oct 7th on > | retailers shelves or advance order from SuSe store. > > yup. details here: >

Updated Step

2002-09-17 Thread Nobody
has just updated http://www.linux-sxs.org/ to incorporate the following: ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 05:11 am, Keith Antoine wrote: > > Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now > you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all. Using KMail: View-Inlined Attachments should clear that up. HTH, Tim -- Caldera eWorkstat

Re: search engine swish-e

2002-09-17 Thread m.w.chang
>>htdig didn't even include an example for excluding hostname. namazu is >>more tailored for japanese audience... > ??? how do you figure that? all the documentation I read was in english. what namazu better than htdig, other than the start_url thing? -- Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~.

Re: SuSe

2002-09-17 Thread dep
begin Lee's quote: | Just got advanced notice from SuSE; 8.1 will be out Oct 7th on | retailers shelves or advance order from SuSe store. yup. details here: http://www.linuxandmain.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=227 -- dep http://www.linuxandmain.com -- outside the box, barely wi

Slashdot | XFS merged in Linux 2.5

2002-09-17 Thread Net Llama!
For those still on the fence regarding XFS, there's an interesting discussion about it on /. today: -- ~ L. Friedman[

SuSe

2002-09-17 Thread Lee
Just got advanced notice from SuSE; 8.1 will be out Oct 7th on retailers shelves or advance order from SuSe store. Lee ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Re: Debian question: Package names

2002-09-17 Thread Joel Hammer
Well, I just forgot about using adminmenu and went straight to apt-get upgrade. This is getting me a bunch of stuff, who knows what. Oh well, linux is an adventure. Joel On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:28:17PM -0400, Joel Hammer wrote: > I added this line to my sources.list file: > deb http://downloa

Debian question: Package names

2002-09-17 Thread Joel Hammer
I added this line to my sources.list file: deb http://download.at.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.0.3/Debian/ ./ I want to get kde 3.0.3 on my libranet 2.0 system. Just using adminmenu and kde says I have the most recent. (2.2.2). However, when I run adminmenu, I don't get this higher version number. I d

Re: XFS has been officially merged

2002-09-17 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Okay. Oh well. Bob Raymond wrote: > On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 22:56, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: >> When will the 2.5.?? stable version be ready - any ideas? > > There never will be a stable 2.5. Who knows, maybe we'll see him add it > to the 2.4 series? (highly unlikely considering how long it t

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread m.w.chang
foxpro! yeah! harbour-project. :) Ben Duncan wrote: > Although everone has a favorite language. when designing such a > system, one must compare cababilties, -- .~.Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. In Linux we trust. / v \ news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org ^ ^

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Keith Antoine
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 03:30, Douglas J Hunley wrote: Whats this I have received at least 2 emails one from Tim Wunder and now you, where all the messages etc are attachments no text at all. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Ret

Re: glibc, ldconfig, and ignorance (attachement)

2002-09-17 Thread Kurt Wall
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:59:06PM -0400, Net Llama! wrote: > Well, this seems a bit worrisome: > ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libcurses.so: No such file or directory Try: # ln -s /usr/lib/libncurses.so /usr/lib/libcurses.so Kurt ___ Linux-users mai

Re: glibc, ldconfig, and ignorance (attachement)

2002-09-17 Thread Net Llama!
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote: > On 9/17/2002 2:59 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: > > Well, this seems a bit worrisome: > > ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libcurses.so: No such file or directory > > > > And your kdelibs seem to be a bit mangled, or at least you're lacking > >

Re: glibc, ldconfig, and ignorance (attachement)

2002-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
On 9/17/2002 2:59 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote: > Well, this seems a bit worrisome: > ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libcurses.so: No such file or directory > > And your kdelibs seem to be a bit mangled, or at least you're lacking > symlinks in places that should have them. Other

Re: glibc, ldconfig, and ignorance (attachement)

2002-09-17 Thread Net Llama!
Well, this seems a bit worrisome: ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/lib/libcurses.so: No such file or directory And your kdelibs seem to be a bit mangled, or at least you're lacking symlinks in places that should have them. Other than that, everything appears to be ok. On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder

new EDI list

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You can subscribe to the new EDI list by visiting http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-edi - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 Admin: Linux StepByStep - http://www.linux-sxs.org and http://jobs.l

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Gary Sublett
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 13:10:36 -0400 Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FREEDI (free dee eye) > Hadn't noticed anyone mention this in the current EDI project discussion and don't know if it is pertient or not but thought it worth mentioning. *** Wal-Mart Mandates Secure, Int

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James McDonald spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > (Doug Hunley I lost your pub key when I used Windows XP to delete a ext3 > partition with disasterous results so your's get's a yellow banner) delete the old from your keyring, then a

Re: search engine swish-e

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > htdig didn't even include an example for excluding hostname. namazu is > more tailored for japanese audience... ??? how do you figure that? all the documentation I read was in english. - --

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ben Duncan spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > REBOL is still a proprietary item, and I could not tell if anyone > who used it was going to have buy some sort of runtime. sorry about that. things changed since last I looked at rebol.

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Douglas J Hunley spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > start w/ ANSI, implement a fairly recent Y2K compliant standard (but not > too recent. maybe 3051?) doing the most "heavily used" (read most uh. I meant 4010. 3051 isn't y2k-ready, II

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Douglas J Hunley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mpdickens spewed electrons into the ether that resembled: > Sounds great to me! What do ya want to call this beast...?... > > OEDI- Open EDI > OSEDI - Open Source EDI FREEDI (free dee eye) - -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) -

[suse-announce-usa] SuSE Linux 8.1. Pre-Order Now!

2002-09-17 Thread Holger Dyroff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear SuSE Linux customers and friends, SuSE Linux 8.1 will be available on October 7th! SuSE Linux 8.1 extends an unprecedented level of user-friendliness and functionality for professional and private users, offering the stability and security of t

Linux is quitely winning even on Wall$treet

2002-09-17 Thread mpdickens
Check this article out: http://www.computing.co.uk/Analysis/1134915 Best Peck ___ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Ben Duncan
No flame seen here Roger. I can do C, no can do C++ -- still a strange beast to me. I also find that some commercial C++ products do things a little differently than others. Also was unaware of Tcl/Tk's progression. REBOL is still a proprietary item, and I could not tell if anyone who used it

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Richard R. Sivernell
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 16:06:34 +0200 Roger Oberholtzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:58:12 -0500 > "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the > > reusability > > of source code. C is old c

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 18:58:12 -0500 "Richard R. Sivernell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the > reusability > of source code. C is old coding. C++ is going to give you the greatest > speed after ass > lang. Ummm... No flame wa

glibc, ldconfig, and ignorance (attachement)

2002-09-17 Thread Tim Wunder
Is it possible to backrev glibc, to go from 2.2.5, that I've recently compiled and installed, to the original glibc that came with eW3.1 or the one that came with eW3.1.1? I'm not sure what's going wrong on my system, but I'm considering backing up, piece by piece, to get to a state that work

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Richard R. Sivernell
Eactly what is EDI, What is it to do. This really sounds great, but I am in the middle of the VCSCI studies and have 2 directed studies coming up and a lot of my time will be taken up. This sounds to be a very large undertaking. cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Richard R. Sivernell
I would suggest that you not use C, but C++ as this is much better for the reusability of source code. C is old coding. C++ is going to give you the greatest speed after ass lang. cheers -- Rick Sivernell Dallas, Texas 75287 972 306-2296 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.

Re: Javascript: Variable scope question

2002-09-17 Thread James McDonald
different syntax maybe will help? e.g. document.forms["form1"].elements[0].checked = true ; document.forms["form1"].elements[2].checked = true ; On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:21, Joel Hammer wrote: > I tried your suggestion, and get the same error with netscape 7. opera > still works fine. > > Here i

Re: Javascript: Variable scope question

2002-09-17 Thread James McDonald
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/examples/javascript/formval/overview.html On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 16:21, Joel Hammer wrote: > I tried your suggestion, and get the same error with netscape 7. opera > still works fine. > > Here is the actual javascript that is causing the problem. It is a bit > word

Re: test 2 sign

2002-09-17 Thread James McDonald
If you use kmail then it's a pretty yellow banner for an untrusted key and a pretty green banner for a trusted key and a really ugly red banner for microsoft security bulletins because they changed there key or something. (Doug Hunley I lost your pub key when I used Windows XP to delete a ext3

address change

2002-09-17 Thread Brad Wind
Hi, Brad Wind (formerly Brad Miksa) writing. I am sending you this because I have received mail bearing the address you are receiving this message at during the last 6 years. I apologize if you receive this message multiple times, via mailing list address, and/or if we never had or never mai

Re: EDI in linux (everone PLEASE read)

2002-09-17 Thread Roger Oberholtzer
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:10:36 -0500 Ben Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Although everone has a favorite language. when designing such a > system, one must compare cababilties, > ease of programming, acceptance, and extensiability. > > Perl, being a favorite of many people, I find lacking in