Direct quote from Linus himself:
A huge merging frenzy for the feature freeze, although I also spent a few
days getting rid of the need for ide-scsi.c and the SCSI layer to burn
CD-ROM's with the IDE driver (it still needs an update to cdrecord, I sent
those off to the maintainer).
Another
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-962117.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-962117.html
That's funny. This from the same group that originally had no interest
whatsoever in the desktop. Thanks, but no thanks.
--
~~
Lonni J
On 10/16/2002 12:45 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-962117.html
That's funny. This from the same group that originally had no interest
whatsoever in the desktop. Thanks, but no thanks.
I think no interest
This is the part that I like:
To keep things coordinated, the four companies agreed to some ground
rules: they will all offer comparable licensing packages and have agreed
not to interfere with the marketing and sales efforts of the other
companies. Each will offer at least two CDs, with one
If you look at the Volution Messaging Server, they basically are
providing a specialized version of a Standard Linux system. Read
about what they include. Basically, they're providing POP3/IMAP/SMTP
(which is standard for all Linux servers), LDAP for addressbook, FTP
for central schedule
I would be torn as to which to offer. I am a die-hard GroupWise fan.
It is relatively secure (ok, for a big install, I'd certainly front-end
it with Sendmail, but that's normal), it has a decent client, it's
NDS-based, and it has good scheduling features. The only thing I have
against it is
Problem here is that while IP is somewhat bound to physical location,
the only registry which is central and at all accurate is only able to
break down to the superblocks. Hexillion.com is the best I've found,
but it's still looking at the whois databases. No major ISP's
register WHERE they
Hi
Ive read a message
from you here http://www.linux-sxs.org/pipermail/linux-users/2002-June/004986.html
And I wonder if you got the
hpt370 to work with Slackware?
If you did, would you be kind
to tell me how you did.
Regards
Per Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
If you follow the thread, you'll find one post form me with some info.
Any recent 2.4 kernel should detect the controller as a standard IDE.
Besides that, IIRC the only raid mode supported by the kernel for
HPT370 is RAID 0 (stripping). And
Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:05:17 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Kurt Wall wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 12:10:27PM -0400, Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Bob Raymond
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:00:13 -0500 Richard R. Sivernell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QWell both of you are just young wipper snappers g I am 56.
A youngster yet; try 59.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? - Code Python
gentoo(since 01/01/01) now 1.4beta kernel 2.4.18+ ext3 GCC3.2
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:51:52 -0700
Bob Hemus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:05:17 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Kurt Wall wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 19:55:55 +
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 08:00:13 -0500 Richard R. Sivernell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QWell both of you are just young wipper snappers g I am 56.
A youngster yet; try 59.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD?
I care about telling the script which form is submitted because I have
an html page with up to 36 identical forms, each form referencing a
separate object (an image). I am concocting a home brew image editing
GUI using opera, or any browser. So, each image is loaded on the page,
and certain
in the auth sendmail sxs article, it mentioned a pam_stack.so in
/etc/pam.d/smtp. I couldn't find such a module in my caldera. not even
the linux-pam talked about it. what is it?
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
Its on a RH-7.3 box in /lib/security/pam_stack.so and is part of the pam
RPM.
On 10/16/2002 07:53 PM, m.w.chang wrote:
in the auth sendmail sxs article, it mentioned a pam_stack.so in
/etc/pam.d/smtp. I couldn't find such a module in my caldera. not even
the linux-pam talked about it.
you meant if I compile linux-pam from source, I would have it?
it's definitely not in the defualt COL 3.1...
Net Llama! wrote:
Its on a RH-7.3 box in /lib/security/pam_stack.so and is part of the pam
RPM.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
This confuses me. How can you rely on an md5sum check from the Redhat disc during
install? How do you know that part of the disc isn't bad to start with?
I noticed this too when I downloaded the images so I could start on the
rpm failure thing.
I believe it to be some kind of funky horn dog
I will try recompile linux-pam myself and check if it got this
pam_stack.so. maybe only the doc was outdated...
Net Llama! wrote:
Its part of Redhat's PAM. I have no idea about any other distro.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/
after a few google search, seems that pam_stack.so is a redhat thing and
possibkly could be relpaced by a few lines of standard pam_*.so entries...
m.w.chang wrote:
I will try recompile linux-pam myself and check if it got this
pam_stack.so. maybe only the doc was outdated...
Net Llama!
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002 08:09:25 -0500
Richard R. Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:51:52 -0700
Bob Hemus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Roger Oberholtzer wrote:
[snip]
Well, I might have you all beat, except for keith. I
22 matches
Mail list logo
