On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:03:12 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> well, originally yes, but usually all MP3s start off as WAVs and are then
> converted to MP3s.
And, what is the actual format of music on a CD?
--
++···+
· Ro
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 19:12:15 -0500
Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I got "volunteered" to be head sound man at our new church. After one
> day it has become obvious we need something more sophisticated for
> recording and playback of services than a simple cassette deck. So I
> plan t
When you install a script from an emerged package, use the rc-update command
to do so. It causes the computation of dependencies and makes sure the
script might complete. If you just copy a script to boot or wherever, I am
not sure that the dependencies will be calculated when the system boots.
Any
On September 7, 2003 17:35, Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:44 pm, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> > Then howcome it was running iptables before network? Just by renaming
> > iptables to p-iptables I was able to get it running?
>
> If you don't use the dependency mechanism, then the
Hi
Two days back I asked a question about the sendmail "gethostbyaddr"
errors..
Our server is Cobalt raq4r. On this server the sendmail is running.. Now
in this server bind was running and all the domains' entries with their PTRs
were present under the bind configuration.
Now very
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, Joel Hammer wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
>>
>> I've been leery of Lindows since reading that they run everything
>> as root. If that's true, it's no more secure than the average
>> Windows box.
>>
>
>Yes, but, you can easily add a r
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:40:58AM -0700, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
> I've been leery of Lindows since reading that they run everything
> as root. If that's true, it's no more secure than the average
> Windows box.
>
Yes, but, you can easily add a regular user, just like with any linux
distro. Usi
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:42:22AM -0700, Net Llama! wrote:
> Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or anything.
Yes, of course it is mozilla, but, it is configured to work.
For example, no font problems, and plugins work as expected.
Joel
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:42:22A
Since booting into 2.4.22 two days & 7 hours ago, i've accumulated 870
frame errors for eth0. I know for a fact that under 2.4.21, i never had
any at all (and that was after weeks of uptime). I've got an Intel eepro
10/100 NIC in this box. I've noticed some sluggishness with data xfers.
Anyo
I may be incommunicado for a day or two while I change over dsl
providers. Apparently, (as I am also transferring my personal domain
administration) the dns change is what takes the most time.
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uns
On 09/07/03 17:49, Michael Hipp wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Just about any linux supported soundcard that's been sold within the
past 5 years can do that.
Thanks. The HCL for RH9 looks like this:
C-Media -- CM8338/CM8738; Creative Labs -- SoundBlaster 128 PCI,
SoundBlaster Live!, SoundBlaster L
The local.start and local.stop are the last and first respectively run by
the system when it starts up. I found the Gentoo startup order a little
disconcerting, too. I guess we'll get used to it .
Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:44 pm, Marianne Taylor wrote:
>> Then ho
Net Llama! wrote:
Just about any linux supported soundcard that's been sold within the
past 5 years can do that.
Thanks. The HCL for RH9 looks like this:
C-Media -- CM8338/CM8738; Creative Labs -- SoundBlaster 128 PCI,
SoundBlaster Live!, SoundBlaster Live! Audigy; Crystal -- CS428X/CS46XX;
ESS
Use /etc/conf.d/local.start and stop for those scripts.
Federico Voges wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:09:21 -0700, Marianne Taylor wrote:
>
>>Am I correct in understanding that the scripts in /etc/runlevels/boot and
>>default -- run in alphabetical order? Where would someone put a command
>>th
On Sunday 07 September 2003 06:44 pm, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> Then howcome it was running iptables before network? Just by renaming
> iptables to p-iptables I was able to get it running?
>
If you don't use the dependency mechanism, then the rc scripts are executed
based on alphabetical order. I
On 09/07/03 17:12, Michael Hipp wrote:
I got "volunteered" to be head sound man at our new church. After one
day it has become obvious we need something more sophisticated for
recording and playback of services than a simple cassette deck. So I
plan to put a Linux box in the sound room.
Card:
I got "volunteered" to be head sound man at our new church. After one
day it has become obvious we need something more sophisticated for
recording and playback of services than a simple cassette deck. So I
plan to put a Linux box in the sound room.
Card: I need a sound card that will deliver go
Bruno Vieira wrote:
Hi everyone.
Do someone here have already installed a Genius Vivid Pro 4 Scanner
under Linux.
Here is the address of the Sane users group. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/E
Bruno Vieira wrote:
Hi everyone.
Do someone here have already installed a Genius Vivid Pro 4 Scanner
under Linux.
Here is the address of the Sane users group. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/E
On September 7, 2003 15:16, Federico Voges wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:09:21 -0700, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> >Am I correct in understanding that the scripts in /etc/runlevels/boot and
> >default -- run in alphabetical order? Where would someone put a command
> > that would have gone in rc.loca
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:09:21 -0700, Marianne Taylor wrote:
>Am I correct in understanding that the scripts in /etc/runlevels/boot and
>default -- run in alphabetical order? Where would someone put a command that
>would have gone in rc.local (so needs to run late)?
>
Nope, Gentoo uses a depende
http://beosonline.de
http://bebits.com
http://beosradio.com
BeOS has found a nitche in the radio broadcast industry.
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 16:39:25 -0300 - "Federico Voges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote the following
Re: Re: Who is Be ?
>On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 10:18:53 -0400, joel wrote:
>
>>
>>This in
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 10:18:53 -0400, joel wrote:
>
>This in today's online Wall Street Journal.
>Who was Be, Inc. ?
>What did MS actually do?
>This settlement sounds pathetic, and another victory for MS.
>Joel
>
http://www.beincorporated.com/
Was the maker of BeOS a a high performance multimedia
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:10:09 -0700
Marianne Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to start a new thread, but Collins mentioned yesterday using bin
> files on Gentoo, how is this done with emerge?
>
A few ways:
1) Supported binary ebuilds (these have -bin in their name). Gentoo
puts these i
Sorry to start a new thread, but Collins mentioned yesterday using bin files
on Gentoo, how is this done with emerge?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Am I correct in understanding that the scripts in /etc/runlevels/boot and
default -- run in alphabetical order? Where would someone put a command that
would have gone in rc.local (so needs to run late)?
TIA
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 13:10, Collins Richey wrote:
> I was only curious why you had singled out GTK, since this is such a
> common practice. M
Only that they were the one that p*ssed me off this morning during an
attempted install of something that ended up in a failed GTK version
dependency. Tha
Net Llama! wrote:
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work
account.
What do you mean by "can't"? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the
bounce look like?
I g
On September 7, 2003 12:04, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote:
> > On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> > > Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
> > > from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work
> > > acc
On September 7, 2003 10:38, Net Llama! wrote:
> On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> > Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
> > Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
>
> What do you mean by "can't"? Is it bouncing? If so, w
On 09/07/03 10:19, Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
What do you mean by "can't"? Is it bouncing? If so, what does the bounce
look like?
--
~~
Marianne Taylor wrote:
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can
from Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
Does kmail work with other subscribed mailing lists?
Maybe the from header in kmail is showing an unsubscribed email address?
ju
Anybody have any idea why I can't mail the list from kmail, but can from
Mozilla? kmail is set up properly and I can e-mail my work account.
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/list
On 09/07/03 10:13, Collins Richey wrote:
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:36:06 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 09/07/03 09:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or
anything.>
I was going to ask what hot new fricking browse
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, burns wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:20, Collins Richey wrote:
>>
>> Maybe you should widen your field of vision.
>
>The problem is, my field of vision *is* much wider - wider than OS
>software. This really is one of the major limitations to the acceptance
>of open source
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:42:13 -0700
Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone found good sources of internet radio that work in mozilla? Many
>
> that I have tried use a url including "playlist=..." which opens to a
> blank window.
>
It's a mixed bag. Go to http://www.radio-locator.com/.
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:39:41 -0700
Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> >
> >I believe Walmart has linux computers, but it's on-line only.
>
>
> I have some minor nits to pick with the packaging on these boxen,
And which distro don't you/we
[ snips ]
On 07 Sep 2003 11:28:22 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:20, Collins Richey wrote:
> >
> > Maybe you should widen your field of vision.
>
> The problem is, my field of vision *is* much wider - wider than OS
> software. This really is one of the major
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:36:06 -0700
"Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/07/03 09:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Net Llama! wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or
> >anything.>
> >>
> >
> > I was going to ask what hot new fricking browser they
ah...
ON my country it called baloto... and it is exactly as you described...
Tom Wilson wrote:
On Fri, 2003-09-05 at 03:22, Jean Sagi wrote:
Lotto? What do you mean?... Baloto perhaps...
Chucho!
Here in America, many states have what they call a Lotto. What happens
is you go to a local conv
Anyone found good sources of internet radio that work in mozilla? Many
that I have tried use a url including "playlist=..." which opens to a
blank window.
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.lin
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
>On 09/07/03 09:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>>Net Llama! wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or anything.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I was going to ask what hot new fricking browser they found.
>
>Lindows is standing on the shoulders of
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>I believe Walmart has linux computers, but it's on-line only.
That's true, and with SuSE 8.2 for just under $300.00US. They have a
couple of faster models for up to $500.00, all of which ship with 128MB of
RAM. I would suggest adding RAM to go > 51
On 09/07/03 09:27, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or anything.
I was going to ask what hot new fricking browser they found.
Lindows is standing on the shoulders of giants. 99% of it is marketing fluff.
--
~~~
Net Llama! wrote:
Its fricking mozilla. Its not like Lindows wrote their own or anything.
I was going to ask what hot new fricking browser they found.
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux
burns wrote:
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 09:38, Joel Hammer wrote:
Michael's Minute: Tipping Point - PC Club
Today, we announced that PC Club is now stocking LindowsOS computers on
store shelves in more than 50 stores. This marks the first time that
a retail chain has committed to desktop Linux by
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 12:00, Marianne Taylor wrote:
> I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
> another mail program?
A-OK
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:00:19 -0700, Marianne Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
> another mail program?
You're coming in loud and clear ;o)
--
Myles Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Slackware-9.1pre + IceWM-1.2.12 + Sylpheed-0.9.4
-
On 09/07/03 09:00, Marianne Taylor wrote:
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
another mail program?
Heard you loud & clear.
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been trying to send messages to the list for two days. Trying
another mail program?
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 11:20, Collins Richey wrote:
>
> Maybe you should widen your field of vision.
The problem is, my field of vision *is* much wider - wider than OS
software. This really is one of the major limitations to the acceptance
of open source solutions by leading system integrators an
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 10:40, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> Isn't QT-2 & QT-3 incompatible with QT1 clients?
>
Probably . I 'trolled' the Trolltech site and their documentation,
but they seem to avoid any discussion of version compatibility.
--
burns
___
Li
On 07 Sep 2003 10:08:51 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whose friends with someone in the GTK dev group? Tell them to get
> their sh*t together. Why on earth would they make GTK 2.* incompatible
> with GTK 1.* clients?
> Bulletin for these morons: backwards compatiblity *is* a best pract
On 09/07/03 06:38, Joel Hammer wrote:
I got this in the last few days from the CEO of Lindows. Just thought
I would pass it along. (See below.)
I know that there are those who don't think highly of lindows, but, they
can rest assured that they are not the target audience of lindows. Lindows
is tar
On 09/07/03 07:08, burns wrote:
Whose friends with someone in the GTK dev group? Tell them to get their
sh*t together. Why on earth would they make GTK 2.* incompatible with
GTK 1.* clients?
Bulletin for these morons: backwards compatiblity *is* a best practise
and development objective.
Isn't Q
Whose friends with someone in the GTK dev group? Tell them to get their
sh*t together. Why on earth would they make GTK 2.* incompatible with
GTK 1.* clients?
Bulletin for these morons: backwards compatiblity *is* a best practise
and development objective.
Just tried to install Nessus on my new
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 09:38, Joel Hammer wrote:
> Michael's Minute: Tipping Point - PC Club
>
> Today, we announced that PC Club is now stocking LindowsOS computers on
> store shelves in more than 50 stores. This marks the first time that
> a retail chain has committed to desktop Linux by puttin
I got this in the last few days from the CEO of Lindows. Just thought
I would pass it along. (See below.)
I know that there are those who don't think highly of lindows, but, they
can rest assured that they are not the target audience of lindows. Lindows
is targeting windows users.
I have been usi
58 matches
Mail list logo
