Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-04 Thread Matthew Carpenter
Cable and Worthless? They get the advantage of continued Internet and Voice lines, inhibiting the sharing of bandwidth between the two needs. Oddly enough, they don't block any well known security exploits' default ports, like NetBus or SubSeven. This all aside, it would seem that perhaps VPNs a

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-03 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/03/2002 05:58 AM, David A. Bandel wrote: UDP Ports: 1034 nlockmgr 1035 nlockmgr 2090 voice stream (VOIP) 2091 control stream (VOIP) 5000 telnet 6801 (VOIP) 6802 (VOIP) 6803 Net2Phone (VOIP) 9900 (VOIP) 9901 (VOIP) 12080 (VOIP) 12120 (VOIP) 1212

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-03 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/03/2002 05:52 AM, David A. Bandel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:27:15 -0800 (PST) begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: [snip] I grepped the list against the services listing that comes with nmap. The only hits were for: com

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-03 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 21:26:21 -0800 begin "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: > On 11/02/2002 08:59 PM, David A. Bandel wrote: > >>Anyway, i remember reading that some mail traffic can be funneled > >>through UDP, but of course, that's har

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-03 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 21:27:15 -0800 (PST) begin Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: [snip] > > I grepped the list against the services listing that comes with nmap. > The only hits were for: > > commplex-main 5000/udp # > ciscopop

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-02 Thread Net Llama!
On 11/02/2002 08:59 PM, David A. Bandel wrote: Anyway, i remember reading that some mail traffic can be funneled through UDP, but of course, that's hardly a requirement. Beyond that, i think NFS utilizes UDP on 800? I only need programs that utilize the listed ports. There are lots more, like

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-02 Thread Keith Morse
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002, David A. Bandel wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Folks, > > I need some quick help. In just 5 days all ISPs in Panama have been > ordered to block a bunch of ports. I need to know what (besides VoIP > connections) uses these ports. This is an i

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-02 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 16:17:15 -0800 begin "Net Llama!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed forth: > Cable & Wireless is pushing this through?? What advantage are they > getting from something this stoopid? Yep. They've been crying they are loosing money ca

Re: Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-02 Thread Net Llama!
Cable & Wireless is pushing this through?? What advantage are they getting from something this stoopid? Anyway, i remember reading that some mail traffic can be funneled through UDP, but of course, that's hardly a requirement. Beyond that, i think NFS utilizes UDP on 800? On 11/02/2002 09:15

Panama to block UDP ports

2002-11-02 Thread David A. Bandel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I need some quick help. In just 5 days all ISPs in Panama have been ordered to block a bunch of ports. I need to know what (besides VoIP connections) uses these ports. This is an initiative railroaded through by C&W here. But I know other