On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:28:43 -0400
dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> quoth Joel Hammer:
> | You can only imagine how much Bill Gates loves to see the linux
> | people arguing among themselves. Such behavior reinforces the MS
> | message. Linux is not for serious people.
>
> i doubt he spents much
quoth Joel Hammer:
| You can only imagine how much Bill Gates loves to see the linux
| people arguing among themselves. Such behavior reinforces the MS
| message. Linux is not for serious people.
i doubt he spents much time on this, or does much of anyone else.
there are always brush wars. and th
Quoth Joel Hammer:
> You can only imagine how much Bill Gates loves to see the linux people
> arguing among themselves. Such behavior reinforces the MS message. Linux
> is not for serious people.
I seriously doubt Bill Gates cares much about the internecine squabbling.
The SCO lawsuit is much bigg
On 06/27/03 20:14, Joel Hammer wrote:
You can only imagine how much Bill Gates loves to see the linux people
arguing among themselves. Such behavior reinforces the MS message. Linux
is not for serious people.
So you're saying that serious people never have disagreements? Have you
ever looked in
You can only imagine how much Bill Gates loves to see the linux people
arguing among themselves. Such behavior reinforces the MS message. Linux
is not for serious people.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> htt
ers will pay
> >whatever penalties there are for this little fracas. OTOH, we may
> >get a better system out of it. Deciding which one it is will be
> >difficult, however.
> >
>
> Although, as you say, this seems to be a "clash of egos". It raises
> s
I think before we all get bent out of shape we need to get more facts. All
we have is one website posted by one person with his viewpoint. I don't
know either the Zeke guy who left nor Daniel at all but I'm going to wait
and see. I don't imaginge it's as one sided as the website says. Gento
omplaints, and Dan's defense sounds distinctly like Baghdad
>Bob. Unfortunately, Gentoo and Gentoo users will pay whatever penalties
>there are for this little fracas. OTOH, we may get a better system out of
>it. Deciding which one it is will be difficult, however.
>
Although,
Reading this and others gives the impression that what started out as a
community project (gentoo) has turned into an empire-building obsession
for Mr. Robbins.
Hopefully I'm dead wrong. Gentoo really has alot to recommend it.
Michael
Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd call it a c
Collins,
> It seems that most prominent open software gurus share one common
> trait: a highly developed ego (just think of RMS). If you want a
> good chuckle, go here to read about the latest squabble between Dan
> Robbins and one of his developers who is leaving the fold.
>
> http://www.zyno
10 matches
Mail list logo
