On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 13:59, Collins Richey wrote:
What I read from this is an interpretation of the GPL that could loosely be
expressed as what is mine is mine, what is yours is also mine.
Oh dear...
I read it as throwing a roadblock in front of a company who has
attempted to adopt the
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS.
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and the
worries of tomorrow,
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS.
I see nothing wrong with it. How would you propose that the GPL
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:59:18 -0600
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:10:36 -0400 (EDT) Net Llama!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:34:16 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no interpretation. The GPL clearly explicitly requires that
you release the source for your work, and all derrivitive works. The FSF
is enforcing that requirement. I'll ask again, how would you propose
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 14 Oct 2003 10:38:07 -0600
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS.
If copyrights are not enforced the courts rule
Quoth Collins Richey:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS.
Naturally, you're reading a slanted article from a magazine that
doesn't understand
Collins Richey wrote:
http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html
This type of legal-schmegal wrangling is what we expect from SCO and its
brethren. It smells no better when it comes from OSS.
Business's ultimate goal is to be a monopoly in the particular area they
inhabit and
10 matches
Mail list logo