On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:52:44 -0800
Ted Ozolins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net Llama! wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> >
[ problem analysis snipped ]
> >
> >No such file exists in Redhat. Perhaps this is something specific to
> >Gentoo?
> >
> >
> >
> I see there is fonts.c
Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
A lengthy analysis of a good strace (collins) and a failure (new)
indicated differences in handling the ~/.fonts.c
Net Llama! wrote:
This could be an XFree problem (?). Now that a usable
~/.fonts-cache-1 file is present, the warning messages I got from xfce
have disappeared as well. Does anyone know which packaged generates
the .fonts.cache-1 file so that I could investigate further?
No such file exi
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> Putting this all together with a little googling that I did, I now
> know the answer. Unfortunately, this is typical linux-free software
> catch-22: if you know what you are looking for, you can find it;
> otherwise, massive amounts of rtfm may or may not lead
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 14:12:51 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:43:41 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > > On Thu
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:43:41 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, s
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:43:41 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Net Llama! wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > >
> > >>This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and
> > >ran>strace. mozilla was segfa
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 19:43:41 -0500 Klaus-Peter Schrage
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net Llama! wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> >
> >>This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and
> >ran>strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
> >>
> >>A lengthy a
Net Llama! wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
A lengthy analysis of a good strace (collins) and a failure (new)
indicated differences in handling the ~/.fonts.cac
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > > > No such file exists in Redhat. Perhaps this is something
> > > > > specific to Gentoo?
> > > >
> > > > I have a .fonts-cache-1 file in my RH8.0 home directory, and all
> > > > my users' homes as well...
> > >
> > > Hrmmm...perhaps its an 8.0 thing? I
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 13:06:22 -0500 Tim Wunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:46 pm, someone claiming to be Net
> Llama! wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > > On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:21 pm, someone claiming to be
> > > Net Llama!
> > >
> > > wr
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Net Llama! wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 December 2002 09:39 am, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> >
> > > > It means does not start, mozilla screen never appears, no error
> > > > mes
On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:46 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:21 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > > This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't ha
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:21 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
> > > strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
On Thursday 26 December 2002 12:21 pm, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
> > strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
> >
> > A lengthy analysis of a good strace (co
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> This is mozilla 1.2.1. I didn't have strace, so I emerged it and ran
> strace. mozilla was segfaulting while handling fonts.
>
> A lengthy analysis of a good strace (collins) and a failure (new)
> indicated differences in handling the ~/.fonts.cache-1 file.
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 09:39:37 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 08:45:26 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What does "will not start" mean??
> > >
> > > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > >
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2002 09:39 am, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
>
> > > It means does not start, mozilla screen never appears, no error
> > > messages in the console, nothing in XFree.. erors, etc.,
On Thursday 26 December 2002 09:39 am, someone claiming to be Net Llama!
wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > It means does not start, mozilla screen never appears, no error
> > messages in the console, nothing in XFree.. erors, etc., but it does
> > build all the usual ~/.mozilla, ~/
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 08:45:26 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does "will not start" mean??
> >
> > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > > I'm setting up other family members but getting varying results
> > > with mozilla:
> > >
>
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 08:45:26 -0500 (EST) Net Llama!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does "will not start" mean??
>
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> > I'm setting up other family members but getting varying results
> > with mozilla:
> >
> > 1. Users collins,cecilia, coleen, and new (added
What does "will not start" mean??
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Collins wrote:
> I'm setting up other family members but getting varying results with
> mozilla:
>
> 1. Users collins,cecilia, coleen, and new (added in this order) all
> have the same setup, i.e. group users extra group wheel (needed for
> us
I'm setting up other family members but getting varying results with
mozilla:
1. Users collins,cecilia, coleen, and new (added in this order) all
have the same setup, i.e. group users extra group wheel (needed for
use of su on gentoo), home directory on /home/username, shell
/bin/bash
2. All home
23 matches
Mail list logo
