RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-10 Thread Brian Witowski
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kurt Wall Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 8:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: KDE from scratch (source) Scribbling feverishly on May 09, Brian Witowski managed to emit: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net

RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Brian Witowski
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama! Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 9:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source) On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote: ---stuff deleted--- ,--rpath -Wl,/usr/local/qt-3.0.3/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib g++: /usr/lib/.libs/libsane.so: No such file or directory Your answer is right here --^ That was my first guess, however:

RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Brian Witowski
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Net Llama! Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: KDE from scratch (source) On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote: ---stuff deleted--- ,--rpath

RE: KDE from scratch (source)

2002-05-09 Thread Net Llama!
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Brian Witowski wrote: THe interpretation *is* the solution. Create a symlink to fix the mess. Or don't use KDE, whichever is easier :) Are those my only options? Can't I do whichever is harder? If you're feeling sado-masochistic, sure, have at it, and all that. --