Rick Sivernell wrote:
List
stupid problem needing simple answer. I have rebuilt my system and
remounted several partitions when completed. I now have permission
denied on the binary programs. They all have : rwxrwxr__ rick
users program name and I am loged in as rick in group users. I
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Rick Sivernell wrote:
stupid problem needing simple answer. I have rebuilt my system and remounted
several partitions when completed. I now have permission denied on the binary
programs. They all have : rwxrwxr__ rick users program name and I am loged
in as rick in
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 08:06:41PM -0700, Collins wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:47:40 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's got to be a highly specific mix. I'm running kernels built with
2.95.3, 3.0, 3.1, and 3.2; a C library built with 3.2; XFree86 built
with 3.2 and 2.95.3; and
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:47:40 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:37:57AM -0700, Collins wrote:
I suppose it all depends on the meaning of is, to quote Bill
Clinton.
Separately compiled components that have no interaction can be
compiled with either compiler,
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 06:37:57AM -0700, Collins wrote:
I suppose it all depends on the meaning of is, to quote Bill
Clinton.
Separately compiled components that have no interaction can be
compiled with either compiler, and neither is aware of the other, but
early adaptors on gentoo
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:03:46AM -0700, Collins wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:53:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2? Can't that be a perilous
path?
You don't upgrade, really.
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:03:46AM -0700, Collins wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:53:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2? Can't that be a perilous
path?
You don't upgrade, really.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 19:55:37 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 07:03:46AM -0700, Collins wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:53:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb
wrote:
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2?
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 07:03:46 -0700
Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:53:38 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2? Can't that be a perilous
path?
You don't
Kurt
At http://www.gnu.org/directory/devel/Compilers/gpp.html all
they have is 3.0.4. where do I get 3.2. Is there any thing else I need to
upgrade to make this work?
cheers
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:00:01PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
How do you upgrade from gcc 2.9x to 3.2? Can't that be a perilous path?
You don't upgrade, really. The default configuration is to install 3.2
in /usr/local, alongside whatever you already have.
Kurt
--
The use of COBOL
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 08:56:20 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 05:34:15PM -0600, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
Kurt
At http://www.gnu.org/directory/devel/Compilers/gpp.html all
they have is 3.0.4. where do I get 3.2. Is there any thing else I need to
upgrade to
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:44:25AM -0600, Richard R. Sivernell wrote:
List
I am trying to compile a library call AI Loom, seems it may require
g++ 3. What do I need to install other than g++ 3, an problems here to watch
out for.
gcc 3.x. 3.2 is better than the others in the series.
13 matches
Mail list logo