On Wednesday 01 October 2003 12:05 am, Joel Hammer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:38PM -0400, Jerry McBride wrote:
NFS literally drove me nuts. Best bet sofar, if you can stand the
permissions mangling is switching to samba. You'll be impressed with the
speed of samba 3.0 compared to
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix this problem without rebooting?
Thanks,
Joel
Quoth Joel Hammer:
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix this problem without rebooting
On Tuesday 30 September 2003 10:49 pm, Joel Hammer wrote:
I mounted a drive on a server via samba on a client (/mnt/Backup) .
I then changed smb.conf on the server to reference a different path, and
now my client complains that there is a stale NFS handle on /mnt/Backup.
Is there a way to fix
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 07:24:38PM -0400, Jerry McBride wrote:
NFS literally drove me nuts. Best bet sofar, if you can stand the permissions
mangling is switching to samba. You'll be impressed with the speed of samba
3.0 compared to NFS any version.
I was using samba, not NFS, when this
