Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :)
I just upgrade the gcc in workstation 3.1 to 2.95.3 this afternoon,
using tarball.
In an attempt to upgrade the gcc to 3.0.2 and such I've somehow
managed to break it
On Friday 28 December 2001 09:44 pm, you wrote:
Hello:
Since I have great respect for the opinions and knowledge of the
individuals on these lists, I'm humbly asking for your help.
I've got the following problem:
Linux 2.4.13 system
GCC 2.95.3
In an attempt to upgrade the gcc to 3.0.2
On December 29, Chang enlightened our ignorance thusly:
Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :)
No. I'm not aware of any embargo on gcc 3.0.2. In fact, gcc 3.0.3 was
just released early this week or late
On December 29, Collins Richey enlightened our ignorance thusly:
Others will be able to help you get back to the status quo ante.
Be advised, I've never heard of any good results using the gcc 3... compiler.
I'm fairly sure that the compiler is indded broken, although you may have
[Posted and emailed]
On December 28, George Kasica enlightened our ignorance thusly:
Hello:
Since I have great respect for the opinions and knowledge of the
individuals on these lists, I'm humbly asking for your help.
I've got the following problem:
Linux 2.4.13 system
GCC 2.95.3
Sorry for cross posting, but maybe this will be interesting on both.
Does anyone know of any lists that discuss reliability and disaster
recovery? I have some ideas below, but they are from my experience only.
George Kasica wrote:
[...]
What I'm asking is: Is there ANYONE out there that know
On Saturday 29 December 2001 08:39 am, you wrote:
On December 29, Collins Richey enlightened our ignorance thusly:
Others will be able to help you get back to the status quo ante.
Be advised, I've never heard of any good results using the gcc 3...
compiler. I'm fairly sure that the
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 06:09:51 -0800 (PST) Susan Macchia wrote:
Mike,
There are a bunch of tools written, do a man of pilot-link. I use pilot-xfer
to simply sync/backup my pilot w/ no GUI (again, man pilot-xfer).
Go to jpilot.org to see a really sweet GUI. They have a great user list.
Alan Jackson wrote:
[...]
I have a cryptic note that I assume is related to setting up jpilot :
ln -s /dev/ttyS1 /dev/pilot
chmod 777 /dev/pilot
chmod 777 /dev/ttyS1
The mode of /dev/pilot is irrelevant since it is a symlink. They show as 777 as soon
as the link is created anyway. The
I really have to agree with Dave on this. I can think of alot of ways
to recover from this, and unless you have money to burn, you really
don't need a consultant to help you do it. But if you still feel
differently, and haven't found anyone for the job, i'll gladly take up
the flag. Contact me
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 05:43, Alan Jackson wrote:
Susan wrote
Kurt Wrote
Folks, this is good stuff and thank you,
75% of an SxS is not so much how to do it, but, in fact, confirmation that it
can be done, even and especially when it's simple.
I'll put a small blurb of collated material
On December 29, 2001 02:39 pm, Mike Andrew wrote:
I also keep getting a message box on startup telling me that I should
save
echo -noxv $HOME/(dot)xawtv
Then when starting up I get:
/home/david/.xawtv:1: syntax error
David Aikema
___
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 05:12, Collins Richey wrote:
rant
It would surely be nice if the compiler and library folks could make
progress without breaking old things. I still remember (not too fondly)
all the havoc that the current glibc generated when it was new.
/rant
double rant squared
THE
On December 30, Mike Andrew enlightened our ignorance thusly:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 05:12, Collins Richey wrote:
rant
It would surely be nice if the compiler and library folks could make
progress without breaking old things. I still remember (not too fondly)
all the havoc that the current
Well, my beloved gentoo distro has become somewhat unstable, so I've
switched back to elx at least temporarily.
A few notes:
1) I've stripped out some of the offending daemons, so startup/shutdown is
a little faster. Still looking at removing others, but going slow to
avoid breaking anything.
This is very odd.
My 'named' server won't start from SysV.
It won't start from a root shell if I try
# cd /etc/rc.d/rc3.d
# ./S10named start
However, it will start if I do it by sourcing the file:
# . ./S10named start
I presume the difference is something it needs from
On 30-Dec-01 Collins Richey wrote:
[snip]
5) Unlike every distro I've used in the past, elx does not include the
telinit command, so the only way I could switch to run level 3 was to
edit
/etc/inittab and reboot.
[snip]
telinit is just a link to init
--
Gary
2:58pm up 40
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
This is very odd.
My 'named' server won't start from SysV.
It won't start from a root shell if I try
# cd /etc/rc.d/rc3.d
# ./S10named start
Does it produce any output doing that?
However, it will start if I do it by sourcing the file:
# .
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 06:13:58PM -0700, Dave Anselmi wrote:
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
This is very odd.
My 'named' server won't start from SysV.
It won't start from a root shell if I try
# cd /etc/rc.d/rc3.d
# ./S10named start
Does it produce any output doing
On Saturday 29 December 2001 04:36 pm, you wrote:
4) Most of my problems with the 2.4.17 kernel are not compiler related,
but rather due to the elx default kernel config compiling everything under
the sun. When I backed out to my standard config, even the much maligned
(by me) gcc3
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 08:23:30PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On December 29, Kevin O'Gorman enlightened our ignorance thusly:
This is very odd.
My 'named' server won't start from SysV.
It won't start from a root shell if I try
# cd /etc/rc.d/rc3.d
# ./S10named start
On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 17:28:42 -0800 Ted Ozolins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 29 December 2001 04:36 pm, you wrote:
4) Most of my problems with the 2.4.17 kernel are not compiler
related, but rather due to the elx default kernel config compiling
everything under the sun. When I
What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
-Original Message-
??? : Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?? : 2001?12?29? 21:52
?? : Re: gcc 3.0.2
Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
list weeks ago)? Could I download it from
On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed:
What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
Its an essential part of any running linux distro.
--
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer,
gcc = gnu compiler collection
Without it, you can't build new software.
--- lesley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
-Original Message-
??? : Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?? : 2001?12?29? 21:52
?? : Re: gcc 3.0.2
I just want to improve the readability in the 2nd article on the webpage
ftp - ftp_server (joel hammer)
begin
irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set the local timezone into your xferlog or syslog,
you need to copy the zoneinfo file to the ~ftp tree.
In general, /etc/localtime is a link to
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 10:58, David Aikema wrote:
echo -noxv $HOME/(dot)xawtv
Then when starting up I get:
/home/david/.xawtv:1: syntax error
That was a fix provided for me by the immortal D Bandel.
if it troubles you
echo $HOME/(dot)xawtv
--
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BEDTIME READING -Hardware Driver API's and Technical Briefs -
CDROM API Kernel Driver Description (new)
Userland Driver source code
IEEE1284 Parallel Interface
The LS120 parallel Interface protocol .
The Zip parallel Interface protocols.
28 matches
Mail list logo
