Re: smaba 2.2.2 and winXP Home

2002-02-10 Thread Chang[linuxism]
problem solved. I forgot to reply. It's the "veto files = /.*/" line in smb.conf Thanks for the link. I now got another place to check for problems. Next lesson is trying to upgrade the Xfree86 in workstation 3.1 to 4.2.0 It could be fun... Joel Hammer wrote: > > There have been lots of issues

logcheck error

2002-02-02 Thread Chang[linuxism]
Sorry for asking silly question again. What is this time? Was it just a probe? Security Violations =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Feb 2 14:00:18 server sendmail[31113]: g1260IN31113: from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=2667, class=-60, nrcpts=1, msgid=<02bc01c1abad$fb23bdc0$b7b8f9c1@foxil>, bodytype=7BIT, prot

smaba 2.2.2 and winXP Home

2002-02-02 Thread Chang[linuxism]
Trying to connect my sister's PC using WinXP Home to my linux server. I can see the samba shares (security=user). One samba share was named "pub". But I could not click into pub via My Network Places. WinXP would complain about "Location of files not available ..." But if I issue: net use z: \

Re: relaying denied

2002-01-30 Thread Chang[linuxism]
thank both of you. PS apologize for mixing up my mail aliases again. :) Tom Wilson wrote: > > In a word. Yes. > From: toylet.linuxism[$p*17N] -- The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of force and farce. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and news://news.hkpcug.org

Re: problem

2002-01-24 Thread Chang[linuxism]
you pay for what you think is important. Most of us here don't (if not won't) find the GUI and M$ marketing important at all. > Apart from this XP was good, has very quick boot time, good integration > of file types, etc. > > Now after using XP it is clear to me that windows has the same way o

[ot] seti

2002-01-24 Thread Chang[linuxism]
can your clients talk to seti headquarter? -- The pivotal point is the "second chance", judged by another set of force and farce. In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf and news://news.hkpcug.org ___ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux.nf/mailman/li

Re: any steps or pointers to setting up CVS?

2002-01-11 Thread Chang [linuxism]
some cvs link I from old messages from the caldera list by Les Bell... :) Greg, take a look at: http://www.redhat.com/developer/whitepapers/intro_dev/cvs.html This is pretty basic, but might get you going. It's part of a longer "intro to C development" tutorial, which you'll find at: http://w

Re: iptables 1.2.4

2002-01-10 Thread Chang [linuxism]
do I need to make pending-patches before make patch-o-magic? The INSTALL/README seemed to suggest that... > the string.patch is only available if you run `make patch-o-matic` in the > iptables directory. You will not get it with make pending-patches or make > most-of-pom. -- The pivotal point

Re: Netscape mail

2001-12-13 Thread Chang [linuxism]
You can buy a neo-domain name from yahoo. Just a few dozen US$. > > > Or even something simpler for everyone like web-served email. I use > > > neomail > > > when I am traveling. neomail.sourceforge.net > > did I lose the plot here? What's wrong with a yahoo account? > > On kmail you have t

Re: Weird Shutdown/halt in SuSE 7.3

2001-11-22 Thread Chang [linuxism]
I had similar experiecens with my last linux install. After 2-3 cold boots, the file system has serious integrity problem. maybe I should convert the mount point / to a jfs... But then, are j-partitions easy to manage? > I can't tell you what's wrong, but I would suggest you make plans to > get

Re: strange processes

2001-11-16 Thread Chang [linuxism]
Got it... /etc/rc.d/init.d/syslog restart reported the following error. What is that "map file"? Nov 16 22:49:06 server kernel: Kernel logging (proc) stopped. Nov 16 22:49:06 server kernel: Kernel log daemon terminating. Nov 16 22:49:06 server exiting on signal 15 Nov 16 22:49:07 server syslogd

Re: Fwd: Possible DDOS network being built through ssh1 crccompromised hosts

2001-11-15 Thread Chang [linuxism]
what's that ssh1 crc bug? Can the bug be removed by patches or openssh upgrade? > An associate's home NAT gateway linux box was hacked by what I am > guessing was the ssh1 crc bug (ssh1 was the only exposed service). > machine looks to have been compromised on Nov 2nd at 1:15pm PST, I > won't kn

Re: PING

2001-11-11 Thread Chang [linuxism]
contact... 300 meters ... closing... Ronnie Gauthier wrote: > > PONG > > On Saturday 10 November 2001 17:58, Ian wrote: -- In Linux We Trust -- http://linux.nf ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/l

Re: Caldera eWorkstation 3.1

2001-07-09 Thread MW Chang (linuxism)
I ticked "All Packages" in the installatin screen. Don't know why I couldn't find BIND. I will check again. Don't want to change until there is enough audience > I don't rember. Bernstein's home page is http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html. > BTW, the 3.1 Beta did have bind installed. That was the way

Re: adding BIND back to eW3.1

2001-07-09 Thread MW Chang (linuxism)
Never mind, I found the BIND rpm from Openlinux 3.1's directory in Caldera ftp server. Linuxism Chang wrote: > > From which site did you get the rpm? caldera? bind9? > Don't wanna use the gui tool. thx > > > I have tried both methods: RPM through the Kpackage / download BIND9. > > Both seems t