Re: System.map

2001-11-21 Thread Mike Andrew
On Thu, 22 Nov 2001 06:30, Peter Ruskin wrote: >kernel=$(echo `pwd`|cut -dx -f2) > cp -f System.map /boot/System.map$kernel BING! Thank u thank u thank u. -- http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get you

Re: System.map

2001-11-21 Thread Peter Ruskin
xit 1 cp -f arch/i386/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz$kernel cp -f .config /boot/config$kernel cp -f System.map /boot/System.map$kernel echo echo "Now you can edit /etc/lilo.conf then run /sbin/lilo." -- Peter Ruskin, Wrexham, Wales. Registered Linux User No. 219434 ( see http://counter.li.o

Re: System.map

2001-11-21 Thread Myles Green
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 22:30:00 -0500 Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Andrew babbled on about: > > How would I automate the copying of the currently compiling > > System.map- to /boot ? > > I tend to write scripts. perhaps 'make bzlilo'

Re: System.map

2001-11-20 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Mike Andrew babbled on about: > obviously, uname -r is wrong, because that aint THE compiling kernel. > There's some fudgery done during make modules_install where it 'knows' the > current compiling version but I can't find the script and magic words as > such to use. it's $VERSION.$PATCHLEVEL.$S

Re: System.map

2001-11-20 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Mike Andrew babbled on about: > How would I automate the copying of the currently compiling > System.map- to /boot ? I tend to write scripts. perhaps 'make bzlilo' does it? I don't know. there's an awful lot of make targets in the kernel nowadays > > obviously,

Re: System.map

2001-11-20 Thread Mike Andrew
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:36, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > In reality, you can run without a System.map without any significant > adverse affects. seems i did so for some years . Thanks for the order of precedence, I've now got a handle on it. How would I automate the copying of th

Re: System.map

2001-11-20 Thread Chang
will make mrproper delete the map files? could be a problem if you forgot about the symlink,... I just learnt... > > I use the multiple map files, not the symlink. _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: System.map

2001-11-19 Thread Net Llama
--- Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Net Llama babbled on about: > > yes. this is how i've done it for quite some time without any > problems. > > the multiple .map files or the symlink? > > if you use a symlink to /usr/src/linux/System.map... w

Re: System.map

2001-11-19 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Net Llama babbled on about: > yes. this is how i've done it for quite some time without any problems. the multiple .map files or the symlink? if you use a symlink to /usr/src/linux/System.map... what happens when you load some kernel other than the one that corresponds to the source

Re: System.map

2001-11-18 Thread Net Llama
--- Mike Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:01, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > > > copy it to /boot and append the kernel version to it.. > > i.e /boot/System.map-2.4.14 > > My current 'method' is a permanent > > cd /boot

Re: System.map

2001-11-18 Thread Douglas J Hunley
Mike Andrew babbled on about: > On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:01, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > copy it to /boot and append the kernel version to it.. > > i.e /boot/System.map-2.4.14 > > My current 'method' is a permanent > > cd /boot > rm System.map > ln -s /u

System.map

2001-11-18 Thread Mike Andrew
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001 03:01, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > > copy it to /boot and append the kernel version to it.. > i.e /boot/System.map-2.4.14 My current 'method' is a permanent cd /boot rm System.map ln -s /usr/src/linux/System.map System.map this assumes that /usr/src/linux