Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Andrew
On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 05:15, Bruce Marshall wrote: > Yes, but how can it be an official test without the obligatory humor > attached... :o) Damn right, it's NOT a test, it's some bl**dy troll. -- http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Jay Nugent
Greetings, On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Michael Scottaline wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:12:10 -0800 > "Robert L. Hemus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled wittily: > > > Not quite kosher, but is this worth 1000 words? > > Bob > === > I'm speechless!! Looks like we now know

Re: Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 14:12:10 -0800 "Robert L. Hemus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled wittily: > Not quite kosher, but is this worth 1000 words? > Bob === I'm speechless!! Mike -- "Many loads of beer were brought. What disorder, whoring, fighting, killing, and dreadfu

Re: Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Robert L. Hemus
Kurt Wall wrote: > > Scribbling feverishly on January 12, Bruce Marshall managed to emit: > > On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:28 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: > > > This is still a test. > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:43AM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: > > > > Please ignore. This is only a test. I

Re: Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Collins Richey
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 13:28:26 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scribbling feverishly on January 12, Bruce Marshall managed to emit: > > On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:28 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: > > > This is still a test. > > > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:43AM -0500, Joel Hammer

Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on January 12, Bruce Marshall managed to emit: > On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:28 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: > > This is still a test. > > > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:43AM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: > > > Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this

Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:28 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: > This is still a test. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:43AM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: > > Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this > > would be filled with misinformation. > > > > Joel Yes, but how can it be

Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Joel Hammer
This is still a test. On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 11:31:43AM -0500, Joel Hammer wrote: > Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this would > be filled with misinformation. > > Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests,

Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:39:39 -0500 Kurt Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled in frustration: > Scribbling feverishly on January 12, Joel Hammer managed to emit: > > Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this > > would be filled with misinformation. > > Consider yourself

Re: Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Kurt Wall
Scribbling feverishly on January 12, Joel Hammer managed to emit: > Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this would > be filled with misinformation. Consider yourself ignored. ;-) Kurt -- Today is what happened to yesterday. __

Testing: Ignore

2002-01-12 Thread Joel Hammer
Please ignore. This is only a test. If this had been a real post this would be filled with misinformation. Joel ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-08-01 Thread Bill Day
hm On Wednesday 01 August 2001 10:48, you wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2001 21:18, Linuxism Chang babbled: > > I expect some nude photoes here... :) > > OK.. Content-Type: image/jpeg; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Squirrel.jpg" Content-Transfer-Encodin

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-08-01 Thread Douglas J. Hunley
On Tuesday 31 July 2001 21:18, Linuxism Chang babbled: > I expect some nude photoes here... :) OK.. -- Douglas J. Hunley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Linux User #174778 Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net/Admin: http://linux.nf/ Brainbench Linux Administration Certified ~~ Now offering Linux

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-08-01 Thread Douglas J. Hunley
On Tuesday 31 July 2001 10:00, Philip J. Koenig babbled: > Sigh. ditto -- Douglas J. Hunley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - Linux User #174778 Admin: http://hunley.homeip.net/Admin: http://linux.nf/ Brainbench Linux Administration Certified ~~ Now offering Linux admin services for the home us

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-07-31 Thread Linuxism Chang
I expect some nude photoes here... :) Auyeung at Technet wrote: > Wondering how many of us would just delete the mail when we see the subject > line saying > "testing -- ignore " ? _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @y

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-07-31 Thread Kurt Wall
In the last episode, we heard Auyeung at Technet say: > Wondering how many of us would just delete the mail when we see the subject > line saying > "testing -- ignore " ? Evidently, not many. ;-) Kurt ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-07-31 Thread Auyeung at Technet
Wondering how many of us would just delete the mail when we see the subject line saying "testing -- ignore " ? :-) Auyeung - Original Message - From: "Michael Scottaline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 10:13

Re: Testing, ignore

2001-07-31 Thread Michael Scottaline
On Tue, 31 Jul 2001 10:00:43 -0400 "Philip J. Koenig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was inspired to comment: > > Just testing. My last attempt at posting was bounced for "relaying > denied". Sigh. > > > Phil = This one got through [obviously ;-) ] Mike -- "A world whe

Testing, ignore

2001-07-31 Thread Philip J. Koenig
Just testing. My last attempt at posting was bounced for "relaying denied". Sigh. Phil ___ http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users