Andrew Mathews offered this little gem:
%
% Question is, what standards should be adhered to? I woult think FHS (
% http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ) would be common sense, as would be LSB (
% http://www.linuxbase.org/ ) just for starters. This needs a consensus
% before any package inclusion discus
Andrew Mathews wrote:
> Question is, what standards should be adhered to? I woult think FHS (
> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/ ) would be common sense, as would be LSB (
> http://www.linuxbase.org/ ) just for starters. This needs a consensus
> before any package inclusion discussions.
That's got
"Douglas J. Hunley" wrote:
> I'm acutally working on setting up another system for this very purpose. I
> was going to start with a Linux From Scratch base, then make it available on
> linux.nf and allow others to help drive the development of the distro..
>
> - --
> Douglas J. Hunley ([EMAIL PR
On Tuesday 03 July 2001 05:12, Douglas J. Hunley wrote:
> I'm acutally working on setting up another system for this very purpose. I
> was going to start with a Linux From Scratch base, then make it available
> on linux.nf and allow others to help drive the development of the distro..
As someone
On Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:42:08 -0400
"Douglas J. Hunley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 02 July 2001 12:59, Warren Rasmussen babbled:
> > > I'm probably hallucinating from the coffee, but I can envision the
> > > people on this list buildi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 July 2001 12:59, Warren Rasmussen babbled:
> > I'm probably hallucinating from the coffee, but I can envision the
> > people on this list building a customized distribution that's quite
> > easily patched on a regular basis to keep curren
