Keith Antoine wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed:
> > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
>
> Its an essential part of any running linux distro.
I guess the debian server I maintain isn't running. No wonder it's so easy to
take care of!
On Sunday 30 December 2001 14:45, Tony Alfrey wrote:
> > Damn! I thought it was "goats cause cancer"...
>
> No, silly; . . . . "Great Caesar's Coats"
Got Corrupting Code?
Terence
___
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/m
On Saturday 29 December 2001 10:07 pm,Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:59:06 -0500 Keith Antoine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed:
> > > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
> >
> > Its an
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:59:06 -0500 Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed:
> > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
>
> Its an essential part of any running linux distro.
>
Damn! I thought it
gcc = gnu compiler collection
Without it, you can't build new software.
--- lesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
> -Original Message-
> ??? : Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROT
On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed:
> What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
Its an essential part of any running linux distro.
--
Keith Antoine aka 'skippy'
18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161
Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electro
What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform???
-Original Message-
??? : Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
?? : 2001?12?29? 21:52
?? : Re: gcc 3.0.2
>Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
>list weeks ago)
On December 29, Chang enlightened our ignorance thusly:
> Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
> list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :)
No. I'm not aware of any embargo on gcc 3.0.2. In fact, gcc 3.0.3 was
just released early this w
Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the
list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :)
I just upgrade the gcc in workstation 3.1 to 2.95.3 this afternoon,
using tarball.
> In an attempt to upgrade the gcc to 3.0.2 and such I've somehow
> manag