Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-30 Thread Dave Anselmi
Keith Antoine wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed: > > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? > > Its an essential part of any running linux distro. I guess the debian server I maintain isn't running. No wonder it's so easy to take care of!

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-30 Thread Terence McCarthy
On Sunday 30 December 2001 14:45, Tony Alfrey wrote: > > Damn! I thought it was "goats cause cancer"... > > No, silly; . . . . "Great Caesar's Coats" Got Corrupting Code? Terence ___ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/m

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-30 Thread Tony Alfrey
On Saturday 29 December 2001 10:07 pm,Jerry McBride wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:59:06 -0500 Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed: > > > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? > > > > Its an

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread Jerry McBride
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:59:06 -0500 Keith Antoine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed: > > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? > > Its an essential part of any running linux distro. > Damn! I thought it

RE: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread Net Llama
gcc = gnu compiler collection Without it, you can't build new software. --- lesley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? > -Original Message- > ??? : Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROT

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread Keith Antoine
On Sunday 30 December 2001 12:33 am, lesley observed: > What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? Its an essential part of any running linux distro. -- Keith Antoine aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electro

RE: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread lesley
What is gcc 3.0.2 ??? A linux Platform??? -Original Message- ??? : Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?? : [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?? : 2001?12?29? 21:52 ?? : Re: gcc 3.0.2 >Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the >list weeks ago)

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread kwall
On December 29, Chang enlightened our ignorance thusly: > Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the > list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :) No. I'm not aware of any embargo on gcc 3.0.2. In fact, gcc 3.0.3 was just released early this w

Re: gcc 3.0.2

2001-12-29 Thread Chang
Is there really an embargo on gcc 3.0.2 (as suggested by someone in the list weeks ago)? Could I download it from Hongkong? :) I just upgrade the gcc in workstation 3.1 to 2.95.3 this afternoon, using tarball. > In an attempt to upgrade the gcc to 3.0.2 and such I've somehow > manag