Guillaume Desmottes schrieb:
> Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 à 02:59 +0200, Thomas Schmid a écrit :
>> I think you've a 2006 Model.
>> Feisty module doesnt work for me.
>> Try it with the snv version.
>>
>
> I build HEAD module but have still same issues.
>
> G.
>
From this:
svn co svn://svn.
Try checking out the trunk from subversion repository:
svn co svn://svn.berlios.de/linux-uvc/linux-uvc/trunk linux-uvc
-Ioannis
thomas chen wrote:
> hello
> do you know where the UVC driver for linux now resides ? most web
> reference to the source return with
> unknown aaddress
> http://deve
Hi Sam,
On Monday 23 April 2007 08:12, Sam Revitch wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > uvcvideo already implements full buffer management. The streaming I/O
> > V4L2 method is fully supported. I might consider using video-buf later,
> > although there are a
hello
do you know where the UVC driver for linux now resides ? most web
reference to the source return with
unknown aaddress
http://developer.berlios.de/projects/linux-uvc
thanks
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Linux-uvc-devel mailing list
Linux-uvc-devel
Le dimanche 22 avril 2007 à 02:59 +0200, Thomas Schmid a écrit :
> I think you've a 2006 Model.
> Feisty module doesnt work for me.
> Try it with the snv version.
>
I build HEAD module but have still same issues.
G.
--
Guillaume Desmottes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jabber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xawtv should support V4L2. I'll have to debug it sometimes to find out if the
> issue lies in the application or in the driver.
Laurent,
It looks like xawtv is passing its argument to VIDIOC_DQBUF without
initializing the memory field to V
hi,
--- Sam Revitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/18/07, Laurent Pinchart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > VIDIOCGMBUF is part of the deprecated V4L1 API.
> Applications should be ported
> > to V4L2. Adding V4L1 support is not planned.
> On one side, this is perhaps for the best. It draw
