On Apr 14, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote:
What's really missing are more reviews and experience reports such as
this:
http://the-gadgeteer.com/2010/03/26/tandberg-precisionhd-usb-video-camera-review/
And comparisons for quality: lens/sharpness, noise, stability of FPS,
overall stabi
Hi Ian, list,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 09:45:15 +1000, Ian Latter wrote:
> My mate and I ran up a test yesterday; and even before we got
> to the test, the camera's native software only saw a 640x480
> device.
So just the usual marketing bulls**t, as we had expected. ;-) Can't
Americans sue th
nice work with the cat - I do
miss
my lego.
Thanks,
- Original Message -
>From: "Dr. Alexander K. Seewald"
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] 16MP or 1.3MP?
>Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:31:52 +0200
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> You won't see a true 16MP USB
Hi Ian,
You won't see a true 16MP USB 2.0 camera because...
* the bandwidth in YUV mode would be far too high for USB 2.0
* cheap hardware MJPEG compression chips only do up to 640x480, so
most UVC cameras do MJPEG only up to this. I don't think a 16MP MJPEG
compression chips will appear in co
must
make an output image that is as fuzzy as foobar ...
Thanks,
- Original Message -
>From: "Paulo Assis"
>To: "Ian Latter"
>Subject: Re: [Linux-uvc-devel] 16MP or 1.3MP?
>Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:15:25 +0100
>
> Hi,
> From your lsusb output
Hi,
>From your lsusb output the camera max resolution is 640x480 (even for
still image)
If you can get an higher resolution in windows, I guess it's probably
trough some sort of interpolation technique.
I doubt however that the quality is any good.
It can also be that the camera uses some sort of "
Hello,
Its a been a long time since I was last working with UVC,
but I found a camera that I couldn't resist, and you're in the
mainline kernel now .. and I'd like to do some aerial photos
from my embedded platform ..
You have a 093a:2700 device listed on your site as
working (and my test
