On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:07:59PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:32 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:55:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:16 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:37:28AM -0700,
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:32 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:55:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:16 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:37:28AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > It'd be better if the approved patches fr
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:55:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:16 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:37:28AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > It'd be better if the approved patches from the intern list
> > > (no idea what that is) were sent to lkml/
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:16 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:37:28AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > It'd be better if the approved patches from the intern list
> > (no idea what that is) were sent to lkml/devel@driverdev lists
> > for review before actually being applied.
>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 10:37:28AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It'd be better if the approved patches from the intern list
> (no idea what that is) were sent to lkml/devel@driverdev lists
> for review before actually being applied.
Its the outreachy program. And http://kernelnewbies.org/OutreachyAp
On 2015/5/20 17:02, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/18/15 08:26, Fu, Zhonghui wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Any comments about this patch?
>
> My acked is already there. I have not been able to test it, but I assume you
> did.
Yes, I have verified this patch on ASUS T100TA.
Thanks,
Zhonghui
>
>
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 09:27:39PM +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Dominik Brodowski
> wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > on my pretty new iwlwifi device 8086:08b1 (7260), the following error just
> > appeared twice in dmesg on 4.1.0-rc4+ (Linus' tree as of Saturday/Sunday
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Dominik Brodowski
wrote:
> Hey,
>
> on my pretty new iwlwifi device 8086:08b1 (7260), the following error just
> appeared twice in dmesg on 4.1.0-rc4+ (Linus' tree as of Saturday/Sunday
> morning):
Firmware problem. Please try to update your -13.ucode from the git
Hey,
on my pretty new iwlwifi device 8086:08b1 (7260), the following error just
appeared twice in dmesg on 4.1.0-rc4+ (Linus' tree as of Saturday/Sunday
morning):
iwlwifi :02:00.0: Queue 16 stuck for 1 ms.
iwlwifi :02:00.0: Current SW read_ptr 109 write_ptr 243
iwl data: : 00
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 23:25 +0530, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> The variable translate is bool type.So assigning true instead of 1.
There are a lot these in the kernel.
$ git grep -P "^[ \t]*(?:static[ \t]+)?(?:const\s+)?bool\s+\w+\s*=\s*[01]\s*;"
* | wc -l
161
Are you going to submit patches for
The function rndis_bss_info_update() has bool return type.
So use bool value flase instead of NULL to return.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma
---
drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/rndis_wlan.c
b/dr
On 05/25/2015 12:55 PM, Shailendra Verma wrote:
The variable translate is bool type.So assigning true instead of 1.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma
When you submit a patch for a particular driver in the drivers/net/wireless/
tree, it is preferred that the subject start with the driver name,
The variable translate is bool type.So assigning true instead of 1.
Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma
---
drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ray_cs.c
index 477f863..0881ba8 100644
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 12:17 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> These are special intern patches that
> dont' go through the normal review process. The intern process is over
> this year. The lack of normal review introduced a number of bugs this
> year. I always complain to Greg about it and he says
From: Kalle Valo
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 15:01:19 +0300
> here's hopefully the last wireless-drivers pull request for 4.1. Mostly
> iwlwifi fixes this time. Please let me know if there are any problems.
Pulled into 'net', thanks Kalle.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:05:13PM -0700, Alexis Green wrote:
> This patch fixes a NULL dereference in ath9k (and likely other drivers) when
> fixed mesh paths are used. The problem is that when a station comes up
> sta_info_alloc allocates ath_node implicitly via hw->sta_data_size. When it
> does
On 05/23/2015 01:01 PM, Michael Büsch wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2015 12:40:38 +0200
Michael Büsch wrote:
I will also try your driver from your github repo soon and see if that makes it
work.
Oh well. To put it mildly, this driver is awful.
It compiles with frightening array overrun warnings in
On 05/23/2015 04:16 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
The driver is reporting a warning at kernel/time/timer.c:1096 due to calling
del_timer_sync() while in interrupt mode. Such warnings are fixed by calling
del_timer() instead.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
Cc: Stable
Cc: Haggi Eran
---
Greg,
Please
On 05/24/2015 11:42 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
I haven't been using kernel v4.1 so I haven't seen this warning, but looking
at the code it seems to originate from the two recent patches to remove
_cancel_timer and _cancel_timer_ex. I see that there's another patch in lkml [1]
that changes del_tim
On 05/25/2015 04:37 AM, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
On 25 May 2015 14:49, "Dan Carpenter" mailto:dan.carpen...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:11:40PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > On 05/24/2015 02:03 PM, Haggai Eran wrote:
> > >On 24 May 2015 at 00:16, Larry Finger mailto:la
Kalle Valo writes:
> Adding John as this involved wireless-testing
>
> Michal Kazior writes:
>
>> On 12 May 2015 at 14:45, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>> Patch df1404650ccb ("mac80211: remove support for
>>> IFF_PROMISC") removed promiscuous flag propagation
>>> to drivers.
>>>
>>> However the patch
In some cases some channel survey data was
reported incorrect.
Channel info events were expected to come in pairs
without and with COMPLETE flag set respectively
for each channel visit during scan.
The known deviation from this is rule for last
scan chan info and first (next) scan chan info
both
When QCA988X cycle counter HW register wraps
around it resets to 0x7fff instead of 0. All
other cycle counter related registers are divided
by 2 so they never wraparound themselves. QCA61X4
has a uniform CC and it wraparounds in a regular
fashion though.
Worst case wraparound time is approx 24
The macro isn't WMI specific. Instead it is
related to hardware chip so move the macro
accordingly. While at it document the magic value.
Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior
---
Notes:
I've had to move more survey logic in "ath10k:
handle cycle counter wraparound" into hw.c hence
this patch
Hi Dave,
here's hopefully the last wireless-drivers pull request for 4.1. Mostly
iwlwifi fixes this time. Please let me know if there are any problems.
Kalle
The following changes since commit f673821864899153142365aca888435815ac93f0:
ath9k: fix per-packet tx power configuration (2015-05-03 2
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Nick Dimov wrote:
> Hello,
> I recently bought the Intel 7260 AC wifi card (below is the PCI info)
> and the card works perfectly in windows with the latest intel driver but
> in linux I get deauthenticating and disconnects (reason -3) every minute
> or so. When th
Patch fixes documentation generation error:
Error(./include/net/mac80211.h:331): Cannot parse enum!
Error(./include/net/mac80211.h:369): Cannot parse enum!
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka
---
include/net/mac80211.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/inc
David Miller writes:
> From: Kalle Valo
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:39:04 +0300
>
>> here's a wireless-drivers pull request for 4.2. This time please pay
>> extra attention to this pull as there are two problems:
>>
>> First of all as you can see the diffstat from git-pull-request in the
>> end
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 03:07:08PM +0530, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> I am sorry for those patches. It was me who introduced those bugs. Yes, it
> was sent during Outreachy process. But it was my mistake as a newbie. May
> be I should have taken care of interrupt mode thing.
>
> I would like to fix
On Mon, 25 May 2015 11:13:32 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski writes:
>
> > From: Jakub Kicinski
> >
> >> This miniseries adds support for the simplest of MediaTek Wi-Fi
> >> devices. MT7601U is a single stream bgn chip with no bells or whistles.
> >> My driver is partially based on Fe
From: Jakub Kicinski
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski
---
MAINTAINERS| 6 ++
drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/Makefile | 2 ++
drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/Kconfig | 10 ++
drive
From: Jakub Kicinski
> This miniseries adds support for the simplest of MediaTek Wi-Fi
> devices. MT7601U is a single stream bgn chip with no bells or whistles.
> My driver is partially based on Felix's mt76 but IMHO it doesn't
> make sense to merge the two right now because MT7601U is a design
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 07:11:40PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/24/2015 02:03 PM, Haggai Eran wrote:
> >On 24 May 2015 at 00:16, Larry Finger wrote:
> >>The driver is reporting a warning at kernel/time/timer.c:1096 due to calling
> >>del_timer_sync() while in interrupt mode. Such warnings ar
EP-FEDC771DF4FF48A9829CB85254E29FD3
hello Joe, Rafel, Wireless Community,
I have incorporated your review comments. Please find updated patch.
From 30f4fb72bcb10f9f6589ea22e26e37631f07f8fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Jain
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 14:15:36 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cfg80211:
On 22 May 2015 at 19:11, Srinivasa Duvvuri wrote:
> Michal,
>Sorry I was out sick last few days. Thanks for splitting and creating 2
> patches.
>The math for total cycle counts makes sense but the math to handle the
> rx_clear_count
>does not seem right to me. For the total cycle count
On Mon, 2015-05-25 at 07:37 +, Rahul Jain wrote:
> diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
[]
> @@ -1340,10 +1340,7 @@ bool ieee80211_operating_class_to_band(u8
> operating_class,
> case 128 ... 130:
> *band = IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ;
> return true;
Jakub Kicinski writes:
> From: Jakub Kicinski
>
>> This miniseries adds support for the simplest of MediaTek Wi-Fi
>> devices. MT7601U is a single stream bgn chip with no bells or whistles.
>> My driver is partially based on Felix's mt76 but IMHO it doesn't
>> make sense to merge the two right
On 25 May 2015 at 09:37, Rahul Jain wrote:
> hello Wireless Community,
Hi :)
> Please find patch for review.
>
> From 328fb9d1b772788fc51e7f9bb21e57a1d91b0188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Rahul Jain
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:02:12 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH] Reordering for better readabilit
EP-FEDC771DF4FF48A9829CB85254E29FD3
hello Wireless Community,
Please find patch for review.
From 328fb9d1b772788fc51e7f9bb21e57a1d91b0188 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Jain
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 12:02:12 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Reordering for better readability and consistency
Signed-o
39 matches
Mail list logo
