Hi,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de wrote:
At a Gentoo (hardened) I experienced - starting with hardened kernel 4.0.6-r1
- the (attached) hickup of the 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation
Wireless 7260 (rev 83) at a ThinkPad T440s. The
From e945737ef2e3a5b7198b9795d6375de85b2fac08 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rahul Jain rahul.j...@samsung.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:04:09 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cfg80211-wext: deleting dead code
In func cfg80211_wext_siwretry(), the value of changed is getting
modified to non-zero value
With CONFIG_IWLWIFI_DEVICE_TRACING=y, these functions are rather large,
too big for inlining.
With this .config: http://busybox.net/~vda/kernel_config,
after uninlining these functions have sizes and callsite counts
as follows:
iwl_read32 475 bytes, 51 callsites
iwl_write32 477 bytes, 90
This patchset removes usage of peer link ID as a stand-in for
AID, in order to follow the standard in this regard.
This revision gained two patches: one was an existing bugfix that
was buried in a reorg patch, and the other is a fix for a missing
length check found while reviewing the code.
Bob
Move mesh_plink_frame_tx() above the first caller to remove
the forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland m...@bobcopeland.com
---
v3: unchanged from v1
net/mac80211/mesh_plink.c | 109 ++
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
Instead of using peer link id for AID, generate a new
AID when creating mesh STAs in the kernel peering manager.
This enables smaller TIM elements and more closely follows
the standard, and it also enables mesh to work on drivers
that require a valid AID when the STA is inserted (ath10k
firmware
According to 802.11-2012 13.3.1, a mesh STA should assign an AID
upon receipt of a mesh peering open frame rather than using the link
id of the peer. Using the peer link id has two potential issues:
it may not be unique among the peers, and by its nature it is random,
so the TIM may not compress
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 02:55:56PM +0900, Johnny Kim wrote:
Last argument of wilc_wlan_cfg_get function is actually structure's address.
This should be changed to be compatible with 64bit machine.
Because wilc_wlan_cfg_get function is mapped by function pointer later,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:48:41AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
Remove WILC_ERRORREPORT macro. If memory allocation is failed,
jump to a label to return this function with WILC_NO_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim chaehyun@gmail.com
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/host_interface.c | 7
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 08:14:08AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:48:41AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
Remove WILC_ERRORREPORT macro. If memory allocation is failed,
jump to a label to return
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:05:53AM +0100, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
Add IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_PS to ieee80211_hw flags
enabling this feature.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 05:01:25PM +0100, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
Add IEEE80211_HW_SUPPORTS_PS to ieee80211_hw flags
enabling this feature.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley tvbox...@gmail.com
---
v2 rebased for 4.2
Ah, nevermind, you did this already, now applied.
Sorry for the noise,
Hello,
My name is Vivek. I am from Bangalore, India working for a
semiconductor company.
I am a C/C++ programmer with 5 years experience in application programming.
Interested in working in Linux kernel programming and networking
wireless drivers. I am a linux kernel newbie.
Requesting your
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 6:16 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:48:41AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote:
Remove WILC_ERRORREPORT macro. If memory allocation is failed,
jump to a label to return this function with WILC_NO_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim
On 14 July 2015 at 16:31, Adrien Decostre ad.decos...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all,
I am experimenting a bit with Wi-Fi Direct on top of the ath9k driver and I
am wondering if it is possible to operate at the same moment, on the same
IEEE802.11n module, a software AP for an infrastructure
15 matches
Mail list logo