Hello,
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:24:05PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > But does that actually work? It's pointless to add WQ_MEM_RECLAIM to
> > workqueues unless all other things are also guaranteed to make forward
> > progress regardless of memory pressure.
>
> It's supposed to work.
>
>
From: Colin Ian King
retry_limit has never been used during the life of this driver, so
we may as well remove it as it is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 3 ---
1 file
I've re-tested selected cases with wmm_enabled=0 set on the DUT AP.
I'm attaching results.
Naming:
* "old-" is without mac/ath10k changes (referred to as kvalo-reverts
previously) and fq_codel on qdiscs,
* "patched-" is all patches applied (both mac and ath),
* "-be-bursts" is stock "bursts"
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 09:30:36AM +0100, Vishal Thanki wrote:
> @@ -734,6 +744,8 @@ void rt2x00usb_uninitialize(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> {
> struct data_queue *queue;
>
> + usb_kill_anchored_urbs(rt2x00dev->anchor);
As already pointed in different email this is not good place
The rtl8821ae_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter function
contains a call to RT_TRACE() that is indented in a misleading
way, as pointed out by a gcc-6 warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8821ae/dm.c: In function
'rtl8821ae_dm_txpower_tracking_callback_thermalmeter':
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 01:29:39PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
>
> Rename a jump label according to the current Linux coding style convention.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
> [Rewrote commit title]
>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:01:25PM +0100, poma wrote:
> On 17.03.2016 19:02, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > Jes Sorensen writes:
> >> Xose Vazquez Perez writes:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> If I do:
> >>> # echo "0bda 8176" >
From: Geliang Tang
Use to_delayed_work() instead of open-coding it.
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang
[Update commit message]
Signed-off-by: Julian Calaby
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 10 +-
On 03/16/2016 11:44 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>>
>>> Do you use 20Mhz or 40MHz?
>>
>> HT20 on 2.4GHz, HT40 on 5GHz.
>>
>> At least that's the wireless AP setup.
>>
>>> Basically, I'd like to see the output
Hello,
I'm looking for hardware which supports 802.11k and 802.11r.
So far I'v tried two USB-Wifi Dongle with Realtek Chipsets (RTL8192CU
and MT7610U). For both Realtek says 802.11k are supported but I
couldn't get it work.
From my point of view the problem with the realtek chipsets is that
The previous patch added an option to rtl8723be to manually select the
antenna for those cases when only a single antenna is present, and the
on-board EEPROM is incorrectly programmed. This patch implements the
necessary changes in the Bluetooth coexistence driver.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
poma writes:
> On 17.03.2016 19:02, Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> Jes Sorensen writes:
>>> Xose Vazquez Perez writes:
Hi,
If I do:
# echo "0bda 8176" > /sys/bus/usb/drivers/rtl8xxxu/new_id
>>>
>>> Hi Xose,
12 matches
Mail list logo