We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1:
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/tracepoint.c:23:6: warning: no
previous prototype for '__brcmf_err' [-Wmissing-
prototypes]
In fact, this function is declared in brcmfmac/debuge.h, so this patch
add missing header dependencies
%ul was likely meant as %lu to print an unsigned long,
not an unsigned with a letter l at the end.
But in fact the value printed is u32 anyway, so just drop
the l completely.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192de/phy.c | 6 +++---
1
Hi,
I am developing a wireless network emulator
(https://github.com/intrig-unicamp/mininet-wifi) and I was wondering
what is the best way to change the RSSI information provided by
mac80211_hwsim. I am able to calculate the RSSI with my emulator, but
the RSSI is not updated by mac80211_hwsim, of
From: Colin Ian King
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in ath10k_warn message.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On 2016-08-26 17:19, Dave Taht wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Johannes Berg
wrote:
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 03:48 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
I'm always rather big on people testing latency under load, and napi
tends to add some.
That's a completely useless
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Johannes Berg
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 03:48 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>> I'm always rather big on people testing latency under load, and napi
>> tends to add some.
>
> That's a completely useless comment.
>
> Obviously, everybody
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 03:48 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> I'm always rather big on people testing latency under load, and napi
> tends to add some.
That's a completely useless comment.
Obviously, everybody uses NAPI; it's necessary for system load and thus
performance, and lets drivers take
I'm always rather big on people testing latency under load, and napi
tends to add some.
Add NAPI support for rx and tx completion. NAPI poll is scheduled
from interrupt handler. The design is as below
- on interrupt
- schedule napi and mask interrupts
- on poll
- process all pipes (no actual Tx/Rx)
- process Rx within budget
- if quota exceeds budget reschedule napi
Johannes Berg writes:
> On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16:47 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>>
>> I suppose that could be a way to do it (i.e. have
>> ieee80211_tx_dequeue call all the TX hooks etc), but am not sure
>> whether there would be problems doing all this work
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 16:47 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> I suppose that could be a way to do it (i.e. have
> ieee80211_tx_dequeue call all the TX hooks etc), but am not sure
> whether there would be problems doing all this work in the loop
> that's building aggregates (which is what
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:16:53AM +0200, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> On some devices the EEPROMs of Ralink Wi-Fi chips have a default Ralink
> MAC address set (RT3062F: 00:0C:43:30:62:00, RT3060F:
> 00:0C:43:30:60:00). Using multiple of these devices in the same network
> can cause nasty issues.
>
>
On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 12:30 +, Undekari, Sunil Dutt wrote:
> > It also doesn't check that you specified exactly one rate, but it's
> > not clear how else this would work?
> I can think of the following options here .
> 1. Consider these rates as only the preference ( in order ) to the
> host
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 15:44 -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> dump_wiphy_parse only assigns filter_wiphy if one of the supported
> NL80211 attributes is present. So for unfiltered dumps, filter_wiphy
> was always initialized to 0, and only interface 0 was dumped.
>
> This was introduced in commit
>
From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan
Older firmware with HTT delivers incorrect tx status for null func
frames to driver, but this fixed in 10.2 and 10.4 firmware versions.
Also this workaround results in reporting of incorrect null func status
for 10.4. Fix this is by
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 12:34 +, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
>
> > So if you get HT_VHT_NOT_INDICATED in the driver, don't you *still*
> > have to parse the IEs?
>
> Well.. Yes, I guess one would need to do that for some time until
> relevant user space is expected to have been updated to support
Hi,
Sorry - missed that mail somehow.
> cfg80211_validate_beacon_int -> cfg80211_iter_combinations shall be
> invoked for the interface combinations , currently.
> diff_beacon_int_gcd_min is applicable for the interface combinations
> and am not sure how can we validate this for a single
On some devices the EEPROMs of Ralink Wi-Fi chips have a default Ralink
MAC address set (RT3062F: 00:0C:43:30:62:00, RT3060F:
00:0C:43:30:60:00). Using multiple of these devices in the same network
can cause nasty issues.
Allow to override the MAC in the EEPROM with (a known good) one set in
the
18 matches
Mail list logo