When using IEEE 802.11r FT OVER-DS roaming with AP_VLAN, hostapd needs to send
out a frame using CMD_FRAME for a station assigned to an AP_VLAN interface.
Right now, the userspace needs to give the exact AP_VLAN interface index
for CMD_FRAME; hostapd does not do this. Additionally, userspace canno
Hello,
sometimes my AP simply stops working.
Typical situation:
- (me coming home from work)
- client (Nexus 5, Xperia Z3 Compact or another ath10k device) can see
my ath10k AP for a brief moment
- AP is gone, errors from below show up in the kernel log
- reboot of my AP is required to fix this
[
From: Rafał Miłecki
It's not needed by the other (msgbuf) protocol, so let's save some size
and compile it conditionally.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
.../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/Makefile | 4 +-
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fwsignal.h | 59 ++
From: Rafał Miłecki
There are two protocols used by Broadcom FullMAC devices: BCDC and
msgbuf. They use different ways for (some part of) communication with
the firmware. Firmware Signaling is required for the first one only
(BCDC).
So far we were always initializing fws and always calling it's
Joe Perches writes:
> On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 14:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
>> o Reindent all the switch/case blocks to a more normal
>> kernel style (git diff -w would show no changes here)
>> That sounds like busy work to me, but if you want
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 14:06 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
[]
> o Reindent all the switch/case blocks to a more normal
> kernel style (git diff -w would show no changes here)
> That sounds like busy work to me, but if you want to do it, go ahead.
It's rea
Larry Finger writes:
> On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Is there any value in that or is Jes' work going to make
>> doing any or all of this unnecessary and futile?
>
> That is not yet determined. The only driver that is to be replaced at
> this point is rtl8192cu. Jes only has USB I/
On 09/24/2016 12:32 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the drivers,
and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex values. I
On 09/24/2016 12:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:57 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
The entries in this enum may be referenced in debug output. Adding explicit
values simplifies the lookup.
A negative aspect to this style is forced renumbering
if a HW_VAR entry is inserted.
Is t
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:57 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> Only rtl8821ae implements WOWLAN; however, the other drivers may receive
> a call requesting information about this mode. The other drivers need to
> ignore the request rather than logging that the default branch of the
> switch statement has
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:57 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> The entries in this enum may be referenced in debug output. Adding explicit
> values simplifies the lookup.
A negative aspect to this style is forced renumbering
if a HW_VAR entry is inserted.
Is that possible?
(adding Jes Sorensen to recipients)
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:35 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> I have patches that makes HAL_DEF_WOWLAN be a no-op for the rest of the
> drivers,
> and one that sets the enum values for that particular statement to hex
> values. I
> also looked at the other large
Only rtl8821ae implements WOWLAN; however, the other drivers may receive
a call requesting information about this mode. The other drivers need to
ignore the request rather than logging that the default branch of the
switch statement has been reached.
Reported by: Jean Delvare
Signed-off-by: Larry
The entries in this enum may be referenced in debug output. Adding explicit
values simplifies the lookup.
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/wifi.h | 208 ++--
1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/
Routines *_get_hw_reg() for some of the drivers were missing entries for
HAL_DEF_WOWLAN. No action should be taken for these drivers.
Patch 1 depends on "realtek: Add switch variable to 'switch case not
processed' messages" submitted by Joe Perches. That patch will log
missing cases with the hex v
On 09/24/2016 11:15 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 17:55 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
Would it make sense to explicitly set the enum values, or add them as
comments, to make such look-ups easier?
If you want to create enum->#ENUM structs and
"const char *" lookup functions, please
On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 17:55 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Would it make sense to explicitly set the enum values, or add them as
> comments, to make such look-ups easier?
If you want to create enum->#ENUM structs and
"const char *" lookup functions, please be my guest.
otherwise, hex is at least a
Hi Joe, Larry,
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 12:02:43 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 13:59 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with the %#x format. What does it do?
>
> Outputs SPECIAL prefix, it's the same as "0x%x"
>
> lib/vsprintf.c:
> #define SPECIAL 64
Hi Larry,
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:10:28 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> As the RTL8192CE does not support WOWLAN, the correct response is to ignore
> that
> call. Clearly, it has nothing to do with your network drops. One thing you
> might
> do is add the appropriate file in /etc/modprobe.d/ so th
Luca Coelho writes:
> From: Sara Sharon
>
> For automatic testing packet injection can be useful.
> Support injection through debugfs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sara Sharon
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho
The commit log doesn't tell a lot. I started to wonder why use debugfs
and not the proper interfac
Rafał Miłecki writes:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> This function is called from get_station callback which means that every
> time user space was getting/dumping station(s) we were leaking 2 KiB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
> Fixes: 1f0dc59a6de ("brcmfmac: rework .get_station() callback")
> C
This message is the last notification about U USD14.5 million bearing our
Name as Beneficiary, all effort to reach you have not be successful,
Please if you Receive this message kindly respond back stating your Desire
to make the claim, Reconfirm your full name and age Mr. Mr.Campbell Neiman
22 matches
Mail list logo
