On 8-12-2016 1:40, Pan Bian wrote:
> Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the
> call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with
> the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call
> to orinoco_lock() fails.
>
> Bugzilla
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:18:23 +0100,
Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> Hi Amitkumar,
>
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 06:40:48 +0100,
> Amitkumar Karwar wrote:
> >
> > Hi Takashi,
> >
> > > From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:ti...@suse.de]
> > > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 10:19 PM
> > > To: Amitkumar Karwar; Nishant
Dan Carpenter writes:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:16:06PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> We have disccused this before, but for wireless it's not really that
>> simple. AFAIK with dyndbg you can only control the messages per line
>> (painful to enable group of messages) or per file (enables too man
I don't have a problem with the ath debug printks. Larry asked me for
examples of better debug functions and the ath code is an example.
Literally, any existing debug functions are better than the
BTC_TRACE_STRING() stuff.
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> But it would
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:50:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > But it would make me very happy if someone would add a similar grouping
> > functionality to dyndbg to make it easy to enable a set of debug
> > messages in a driver.
>
Kalle Valo writes:
> Linus said that he will release 4.9 either next Sunday or a week after,
> which means that the merge window is getting close. If there's something
> you absolutely need to have in 4.10 better send them NOW to not miss the
> window.
Dave closed net-next earlier than normally
From: Johannes Berg
When mac80211 abandons an association attempt, it may free
all the data structures, but inform cfg80211 and userspace
about it only by sending the deauth frame it received, in
which case cfg80211 has no link to the BSS struct that was
used and will not cfg80211_unhold_bss() it
Bharat Kumar Gogada writes:
> > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list]
Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireless. Full thread below for the
folks there.
>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:49:42PM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Did anyone test Atheros ATH9 driver(drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
> >
> >> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with
> >> the
> >>
On 8-12-2016 18:52, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
>>>
What about Arend's comment regarding this f
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Arend Van Spriel
wrote:
> On 7-12-2016 19:39, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg
>> wrote:
>>>
Indeed, results are results. I just want to take care of two things:
1) Memory consumption - we can clear stale scan result
Hi,
Can any one tell, when exactly the chip sends ASSERT & DEASSERT in driver.
It might help us to debug issue further.
Thanks & Regards,
Bharat
> > > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list]
>
> Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireless. Full thread below for the folks
> there.
>
> >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 a
Sorry, Forgot to add kernel version, we are using 4.6 kernel.
> Hi,
> Can any one tell, when exactly the chip sends ASSERT & DEASSERT in driver.
> It might help us to debug issue further.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Bharat
>
> > > > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list]
> >
> > Thanks, but please also CC linux-
13 matches
Mail list logo