Re: [PATCH 1/1] orinoco: fix improper return value

2016-12-08 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 8-12-2016 1:40, Pan Bian wrote: > Function orinoco_ioctl_commit() returns 0 (indicates success) when the > call to orinoco_lock() fails. Thus, the return value is inconsistent with > the execution status. It may be better to return "-EBUSY" when the call > to orinoco_lock() fails. > > Bugzilla

Re: Non-working mwifiex_sdio with SD8897

2016-12-08 Thread Takashi Iwai
On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 11:18:23 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Hi Amitkumar, > > On Thu, 08 Dec 2016 06:40:48 +0100, > Amitkumar Karwar wrote: > > > > Hi Takashi, > > > > > From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:ti...@suse.de] > > > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 10:19 PM > > > To: Amitkumar Karwar; Nishant

Re: [PATCH 10/14] rtlwifi: Add BTC_TRACE_STRING to new btcoex

2016-12-08 Thread Kalle Valo
Dan Carpenter writes: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 02:16:06PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: >> We have disccused this before, but for wireless it's not really that >> simple. AFAIK with dyndbg you can only control the messages per line >> (painful to enable group of messages) or per file (enables too man

Re: [PATCH 10/14] rtlwifi: Add BTC_TRACE_STRING to new btcoex

2016-12-08 Thread Dan Carpenter
I don't have a problem with the ath debug printks. Larry asked me for examples of better debug functions and the ath code is an example. Literally, any existing debug functions are better than the BTC_TRACE_STRING() stuff. On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > But it would

Re: [PATCH 10/14] rtlwifi: Add BTC_TRACE_STRING to new btcoex

2016-12-08 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 02:50:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:43:42PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > > But it would make me very happy if someone would add a similar grouping > > functionality to dyndbg to make it easy to enable a set of debug > > messages in a driver. >

wireless-drivers-next is closed for 4.10

2016-12-08 Thread Kalle Valo
Kalle Valo writes: > Linus said that he will release 4.9 either next Sunday or a week after, > which means that the merge window is getting close. If there's something > you absolutely need to have in 4.10 better send them NOW to not miss the > window. Dave closed net-next earlier than normally

[PATCH] cfg80211/mac80211: fix BSS leaks when abandoning assoc attempts

2016-12-08 Thread Johannes Berg
From: Johannes Berg When mac80211 abandons an association attempt, it may free all the data structures, but inform cfg80211 and userspace about it only by sending the deauth frame it received, in which case cfg80211 has no link to the BSS struct that was used and will not cfg80211_unhold_bss() it

Re: ATH9 driver issues on ARM64

2016-12-08 Thread Kalle Valo
Bharat Kumar Gogada writes: > > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list] Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireless. Full thread below for the folks there. >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:49:42PM +, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Did anyone test Atheros ATH9 driver(drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cfg80211: Add support to sched scan to report better BSSs

2016-12-08 Thread Malinen, Jouni
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net] > > > >> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with > >> the > >>

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cfg80211: Add support to sched scan to report better BSSs

2016-12-08 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 8-12-2016 18:52, Malinen, Jouni wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote: >> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote: -Original Message- From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net] >>> What about Arend's comment regarding this f

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Universal scan proposal

2016-12-08 Thread Dmitry Shmidt
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 7-12-2016 19:39, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Johannes Berg >> wrote: >>> Indeed, results are results. I just want to take care of two things: 1) Memory consumption - we can clear stale scan result

RE: ATH9 driver issues on ARM64

2016-12-08 Thread Bharat Kumar Gogada
Hi, Can any one tell, when exactly the chip sends ASSERT & DEASSERT in driver. It might help us to debug issue further. Thanks & Regards, Bharat > > > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list] > > Thanks, but please also CC linux-wireless. Full thread below for the folks > there. > > >> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 a

RE: ATH9 driver issues on ARM64

2016-12-08 Thread Bharat Kumar Gogada
Sorry, Forgot to add kernel version, we are using 4.6 kernel. > Hi, > Can any one tell, when exactly the chip sends ASSERT & DEASSERT in driver. > It might help us to debug issue further. > > Thanks & Regards, > Bharat > > > > > [+cc Kalle, ath9k list] > > > > Thanks, but please also CC linux-