On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Tahia Khan wrote:
> Rename struct tstrRSSI to rssi_history_buffer for clarity
> and to remove camel casing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tahia Khan
Acked-by: Julia Lawall
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.h | 4 ++--
>
Sourced from the current legislation at
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2016C00432
The current rules exceed legal limits between 5250-5330MHz, and permit
illegal operation in 5600-5650MHz (disallowed regardless of DFS).
Frequency ranges and EIRP limits for all ranges have been updated to
hi Linux
http://blog.iconversity.com/product.php?action=24kyew6ae2vhk5
Mark Coste
Board Data File (BDF) is loaded upon driver boot-up procedure. The right
board data file is identified, among others, by device and sybsystem ids.
The problem, however, can occur when the (default) board data file cannot
fulfill with the vendor requirements and it is necessary to use a different
Change name of str_rssi to rssi_history within the network_info
struct for clarity.
Signed-off-by: Tahia Khan
Acked-by: Julia Lawall
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.h | 2 +-
drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c |
Remove Hungarian notation and camel casing from all tstrRSSI members'
names. Additionally, change type of u8Full to bool since it only takes
values 1 or 0.
Signed-off-by: Tahia Khan
Acked-by: Julia Lawall
---
Rename struct tstrRSSI to rssi_history_buffer for clarity
and to remove camel casing.
Signed-off-by: Tahia Khan
---
drivers/staging/wilc1000/coreconfigurator.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Multiple coding style changes to struct tstrRSSI. Initially reported by
checkpath.pl:
Avoid CamelCase:
Avoid CamelCase:
Avoid CamelCase:
Changes since v3: Reformatting commit messages, as requested by
Julia Lawall
Tahia Khan (3):
staging: wilc1000: Rename
Hi Rob,
>>> It appears that TI WiLink devices including NFC (WL185x/WL189x) never
>>> shipped. The only information I found were announcements in Feb
>>> 2012 about the parts. There's been no activity on this driver besided
>>> common changes since initially added in Jan 2012. There's also no in
Am 24.02.2017 um 20:37 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> So let's see. The error *isn't* generated by mac80211 or iwlwifi, but
> it's still returned through wiphy_suspend(). That function just calls
> mac80211 though, and never generates any error conditions by itself. As
> a consequence, this must be
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>> It appears that TI WiLink devices including NFC (WL185x/WL189x) never
>> shipped. The only information I found were announcements in Feb
>> 2012 about the parts. There's been no activity on this driver
From: Jesse Jones
Changes since v1: Only flush tx queue if interface is mesh mode.
This prevents kernel panics due to uninitialized spin_lock.
When more than one station hears a broadcast request, it is possible that
multiple devices will reply at the same time,
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 19:51 +0100, Oliver Freyermuth wrote:
>
> Thanks for your reply and the suggestion! I have put the two lines
> directly after the last #include
> in both files, i.e. both drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/mvm.h
> and net/mac80211/ieee80211_i.h .
> Sadly, none of them
Am 24.02.2017 um 13:11 schrieb Johannes Berg:
>> However, when trying to suspend to RAM ( echo mem > /sys/power/state
>> ), I get:
>> [46656.403767] dpm_run_callback(): wiphy_suspend+0x0/0x97 [cfg80211]
>> returns -16
>> [46656.403769] PM: Device phy0 failed to suspend async: error -16
>>
>
>
From: Rafał Miłecki
When PSM's watchdog fires hardware / firmware is not operational. It
seems there isn't a way to restart firmware & reapply all settings so
instead shut all interfaces down. This is at least some signal for the
user things went wrong and allows reacting to
From: Rafał Miłecki
So far we were attaching BRCMF_E_PSM_WATCHDOG event listener in
brcmf_debug_attach which gets compiled only with CONFIG_BRCMDBG. This
event means something went wrong and firmware / hardware usually can't
be expected to work (reliably).
Such a problem is
On 02/23/2017 10:36 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
+ msg_head = genlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, _genl_family, 0,
+ HWSIM_CMD_NOTIFY);
I think you should use a more specific command name.
My idea was that other attributes could be added over time without
having to add
422:25:31
新《劳动合同法》、《社会保险法》、《工伤保险条例》实操
应对策略与有效调岗调薪、裁员解雇及违纪问题员工处理技巧
2017年3月3--4日---上海(A单元)
2017年3月10--11日-深圳(A单元)
2017年3月17--18日-北京(A单元)
2017年3月24--25日-广州(A单元)
2017年3月31-4月1日上海(B单元)
2017年4月14--15日-深圳(B单元)
2017年4月21--22日-北京(B单元)
2017年4月28--29日-广州(B单元)
2
On 02/23/2017 10:39 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
+ !info->attrs[HWSIM_ATTR_SIGNAL]) {
+ if (net_ratelimit())
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG " hwsim rx-nl: Missing
required attribute\n");
I'm not convinced net_ratelimit() is a good idea, that's a global rate
On 02/23/2017 10:42 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
+ static unsigned int cnt = 0;
+ /* This is fairly common, and usually not a
bug. So, print errors
+ rarely. */
+ if (((cnt++ & 0x3FF) == 0x3FF) && net_ratelimit())
+
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 01:20:24PM +1030, Ryan Mounce wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 02:05, Seth Forshee wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 12:22:53AM +1030, Ryan Mounce wrote:
> >> Sourced from the current legislation at
> >>
On 02/24/2017 12:45 AM, Andrew Zaborowski wrote:
On 24 February 2017 at 01:28, wrote:
Modify the receive-from-user-space logic to do length
and 'is-down' checks before trying to allocate an skb.
And, if we are going to ignore the pkt due to radio idle,
then do not
On 2017-02-24 14:21, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
On 24-2-2017 13:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
43602a0 uses chip revision 0 compared to 43602a1 with revision 1. In
brcmfmac there is support for 43602a1 and from what I know supporting
43602a0 would require loading
On 2017-02-24 14:31, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
On 24-2-2017 14:10, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
From: Rafał Miłecki
It avoids some unnecessary work. Most likely there wasn't much sense
in
doing this before bus reset anyway, as reset is supposed to put chip
into default state. In
We observed a SHUTDOWN command timeout during reboot stress test due
to a corner case firmware bug. It leads to use-after-free on adapter
structure pointer and crash.
We already have a cancel_work_sync() call in teardown thread. This
issue is fixed by having this call just before
On 24-2-2017 13:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> Many chips have few variants/versions, e.g. BCM4366 can be 4366b1 or
> 4366c0. Cutting name at the letter isn't a good idea as sometimes we may
> have e.g. a0 and a1.
As explained in 1/2, the revision may
On 24-2-2017 13:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki
>
> 43602a0 uses chip revision 0 compared to 43602a1 with revision 1. In
> brcmfmac there is support for 43602a1 and from what I know supporting
> 43602a0 would require loading a different firmware.
This is not
From: Rafał Miłecki
It avoids some unnecessary work. Most likely there wasn't much sense in
doing this before bus reset anyway, as reset is supposed to put chip
into default state. In PCIe code (only bus implementing reset) we e.g.
use watchdog to perform a chip "reboot".
W dniu 24.02.2017 o 13:13, Johannes Berg pisze:
> Hi Jarek,
Hello Johannes,
>> What might be the cause? Is there anything I can do to help debug or
>> fix this?
>
> Thanks for the detailed bug report and analysis! I can't analyse this
> in depth right now, can you please file a bug on
> I have been trying to get basic WoWLAN to work with the following
> configuration:
> - Intel Corporation Wireless 7260 (rev 73) with in-tree iwlwifi
> driver
So I just tried on 4.9 with a 6205 NIC and it works there. The
difference must be somewhere in mvm/d3.c then, I guess. I got a lot of
From: Rafał Miłecki
Many chips have few variants/versions, e.g. BCM4366 can be 4366b1 or
4366c0. Cutting name at the letter isn't a good idea as sometimes we may
have e.g. a0 and a1.
This is just a cosmetic change, a trivial cleanup. It obviously doesn't
change fw filenames as
From: Rafał Miłecki
43602a0 uses chip revision 0 compared to 43602a1 with revision 1. In
brcmfmac there is support for 43602a1 and from what I know supporting
43602a0 would require loading a different firmware.
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki
---
Hi Arend,
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 10:58 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 24-2-2017 10:43, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > Hi Arend,
> >
> > On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:16 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am using Linux Kernel
Hi Kalle,
On 02/24/2017 07:01 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Jeffy Chen writes:
Currrently we are disabling this wake irq after receiving it. If this
happens before we finish suspend and the pm event check is disabled,
the system will continue suspending, and this irq would
On 24-2-2017 11:26, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 10:58 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 24-2-2017 10:43, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>> Hi Arend,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:16 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jarek,
[snip]
> What might be the cause? Is there anything I can do to help debug or
> fix this?
Thanks for the detailed bug report and analysis! I can't analyse this
in depth right now, can you please file a bug on bugzilla.kernel.org?
Thanks,
johannes
Hi Arend,
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:16 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
> On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Linux Kernel v4.9.9 and wpa_supplicant 2.6. When running
> > 'wpa_cli wps_pin any', the following messages are printed:
> >
> > """
> > > wps_pin any
Jeffy Chen writes:
> Currrently we are disabling this wake irq after receiving it. If this
> happens before we finish suspend and the pm event check is disabled,
> the system will continue suspending, and this irq would not work again.
>
> We may need to abort system
Hi Arend,
On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:16 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
> On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am using Linux Kernel v4.9.9 and wpa_supplicant 2.6. When running
> > 'wpa_cli wps_pin any', the following messages are printed:
> >
> > """
> > > wps_pin any
On 24-2-2017 10:43, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> On Fri, 2017-02-24 at 09:16 +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using Linux Kernel v4.9.9 and wpa_supplicant 2.6. When running
>>> 'wpa_cli wps_pin any', the following messages are
On 23-2-2017 21:53, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 12 September 2016 at 07:22, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Few months ago Hante added support for 4366c0 to the brcmfmac. There
>> are already few devices with this chipset on the market. We even have
>> some related bug
On 24 February 2017 at 01:28, wrote:
> Modify the receive-from-user-space logic to do length
> and 'is-down' checks before trying to allocate an skb.
>
> And, if we are going to ignore the pkt due to radio idle,
> then do not return an error code to user-space.
On 23-2-2017 21:21, Jörg Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Linux Kernel v4.9.9 and wpa_supplicant 2.6. When running
> 'wpa_cli wps_pin any', the following messages are printed:
>
> """
>> wps_pin any
> [ 4011.779108] brcmfmac: brcmf_vif_set_mgmt_ie: vndr ie set error : -30
> [
On 21-2-2017 13:37, Johannes Berg wrote:
> From: Avraham Stern
>
> Add API for setting the PMK to the driver. For FT support, allow
> setting also the PMK-R0 Name.
>
> This can be used by drivers that support 4-Way handshake offload
> while IEEE802.1X authentication
44 matches
Mail list logo