On 2016-04-11 19:04, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Hi Gustav,
thank you for your work.
Can you please test attached patch.
Hi Oleksij,
this report isn't much, on the other hand you were very quick to come up
with a patch, well done.
The patch does work as expected. Laptop seems to enjoy its new
Hi Gustav,
thank you for your work.
Can you please test attached patch.
Am 11.04.2016 um 04:28 schrieb Gustav Frederiksen:
> Hi,
> thank you for taking the time to answer my previous email and for
> providing those useful tips.
--
Regards,
Oleksij
diff --git
Hi,
thank you for taking the time to answer my previous email and for
providing those useful tips.
All the points you made are valid.
Especially, the same output of "iwconfig" was indeed pasted twice by
mistake.
Please find a new and hopefully correct report below this message.
The
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 8:24 AM, wrote:
> Hello, the following commit introduced what looks like a regression on
> AR9281 and supposedly other wireless chipsets using the AR9002 part of the
> ath9k driver.
>
> After this commit the network interface's "Bit Rate" as
Hello, the following commit introduced what looks like a regression on
AR9281 and supposedly other wireless chipsets using the AR9002 part of
the ath9k driver.
After this commit the network interface's "Bit Rate" as shown in
"iwconfig" drops from the usual 65Mbps in N mode to 11Mbps also in N