> -Original Message-
> From: ath10k On Behalf Of Kalle Valo
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 8:58 PM
> To: Venkateswara Naralasetty
> Cc: Kan Yan ; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org;
> ath...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Add wrapp
> Johannes had an interesting idea to use trace_ath10k_log_dbg_enabled().
> Could you investigate if that would work? That way we might get the
> performance improvement even when is enabled CONFIG_ATH10K_TRACING (but
> actual trace point is disabled, of course).
That's a good idea. This patch was
Venkateswara Naralasetty writes:
> ath10k_dbg() is called in ath10k_process_rx() with huge set of arguments
> which is causing CPU overhead even when debug_mask is not set.
> Good improvement was observed in the receive side performance when call
> to ath10k_dbg() is avoided in the RX path.
>
> S
ath10k_dbg() is called in ath10k_process_rx() with huge set of arguments
which is causing CPU overhead even when debug_mask is not set.
Good improvement was observed in the receive side performance when call
to ath10k_dbg() is avoided in the RX path.
Since currently all debug messages are sent via
