On 07/26/2015 02:32 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 07/25/2015 10:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found some compile problems in the code, but I haven't runtime tested
>> it, but will do that.
>>
>> Hauke
>>
> Currently there is a NACK from me, but generally I like that this patch
> remo
On 07/25/2015 10:07 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found some compile problems in the code, but I haven't runtime tested
> it, but will do that.
>
> Hauke
>
Currently there is a NACK from me, but generally I like that this patch
removes some code.
I tested with patch on top of kernel 4.1
Hi,
I found some compile problems in the code, but I haven't runtime tested
it, but will do that.
Hauke
On 07/21/2015 11:04 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This switches the BCMA GPIO driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP to
> handle its interrupts instead of rolling its own copy of the
> irqdomain handling
On 21 July 2015 at 23:04, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This switches the BCMA GPIO driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP to
> handle its interrupts instead of rolling its own copy of the
> irqdomain handling etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
> ---
> Hi BCMA people,
>
> if we can figure this out it would be
This switches the BCMA GPIO driver to use GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP to
handle its interrupts instead of rolling its own copy of the
irqdomain handling etc.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij
---
Hi BCMA people,
if we can figure this out it would be great if you can test this
and merge it through whatever GIT tr