On 15-11-2016 12:10, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
>
>>> Well, not before you pointed it out ;-). You are welcome to send a patch
>>> fixing it. Otherwise, I will take care of it.
>>
>> attaching a format-patch like version.
>> I don't think we need a Tested-by or whatever, be
Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
>> Signed-off-by: Nicola Smaldone
>
>> Signed-off-by: Arlone Marco
>
>>Please note that you cannot add Signed-off-by for other people without
>>their explicit approval (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches). I don't
>>know if they did it in this case or not, but wan
; Arlone Marco
Oggetto: RE: [PATCH] broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211 driver, bad
regulatory domain frequency value
No problem for me, thanks.
Nicola SMALDONE
www.tierratelematics.com
-Original Message-
From: Gianfranco Costamagna [mailto:locutusofb...@debian.org]
Sent: martedì 15
@vger.kernel.org; Nicola
Smaldone ; marco.arl...@roj.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211 driver, bad
regulatory domain frequency value
Hi,
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Smaldone
> Signed-off-by: Arlone Marco
>Please note that you cannot add Signed-off-by for other peopl
Hi,
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Smaldone
> Signed-off-by: Arlone Marco
>Please note that you cannot add Signed-off-by for other people without
>their explicit approval (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches). I don't
>know if they did it in this case or not, but wanted to point out this
>anyway.
Gianfranco Costamagna writes:
>> Well, not before you pointed it out ;-). You are welcome to send a patch
>> fixing it. Otherwise, I will take care of it.
>
> attaching a format-patch like version.
> I don't think we need a Tested-by or whatever, because it is just a typo in a
> comment.
> (this
Hi Arend,
>Well, not before you pointed it out ;-). You are welcome to send a patch
>fixing it. Otherwise, I will take care of it.
attaching a format-patch like version.
I don't think we need a Tested-by or whatever, because it is just a typo in a
comment.
(this is my first contribution, feel
Hi Arend,
>Finally response. As it turns out the range was explcitly changed
>enabling channels 12 and 13 to be used where applicable. They forgot to
>update the comment.
so, the struct in net/wireless/reg.c is actually used in that case?
static const struct ieee80211_regdomain world_regdom =
On 14-11-2016 12:34, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
>
>> Finally response. As it turns out the range was explcitly changed
>
>> enabling channels 12 and 13 to be used where applicable. They forgot to
>> update the comment.
>
>
> so, the struct in net/wireless/reg.c is actually used
On 28-10-2016 22:41, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 28-10-2016 18:15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> (resending from my debian.org mail address, to avoid spam filtering)
>>
>> Hi Broadcom developers and linux wireless list.
>>
>> We found a possible issue in the cfg80211 implementation of the regula
On 28-10-2016 18:15, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> (resending from my debian.org mail address, to avoid spam filtering)
>
> Hi Broadcom developers and linux wireless list.
>
> We found a possible issue in the cfg80211 implementation of the regulatory
> domain rules:
>
> .reg_rules = {
(resending from my debian.org mail address, to avoid spam filtering)
Hi Broadcom developers and linux wireless list.
We found a possible issue in the cfg80211 implementation of the regulatory
domain rules:
.reg_rules = {
/* IEEE 802.11b/g, channels 1..11 */
12 matches
Mail list logo