On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:18 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> Add a comment indicating that the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 case falls
> through to the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 case in iwl_mvm_send_sta_key.
> This will document that the lack of a break is intentional.
>
> Coverity: CID 1260023
>
> Sig
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:18 -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> Add a comment indicating that the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 case falls
> through to the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 case in iwl_mvm_send_sta_key.
> This will document that the lack of a break is intentional.
>
> Coverity: CID 1260023
>
> Sig
Add a comment indicating that the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP104 case falls
through to the WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_WEP40 case in iwl_mvm_send_sta_key.
This will document that the lack of a break is intentional.
Coverity: CID 1260023
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville
---
This seems to work, so I'm guessing tha