Hello,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:43:22PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 20:37 +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> > Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> > create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is
> > scheduled for removal.
>
Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is scheduled
for removal.
There are work items doing related operations that shouldn't be swapped when
queued in a certain order hence preserve the strict execution orderin
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 20:37 +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is
> scheduled for removal.
Scheduled where?
> static void iwl_setup_deferred_work(struct iwl_priv *priv)
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 01:43:22PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 20:37 +0800, Eva Rachel Retuya wrote:
> > > Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> > > create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and
> > > is scheduled f
>
> Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is
> scheduled
> for removal.
I can't see any indication of that in the code of workqueue.
Can you share details about that?
>
> There are work items doing relate
Hello,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:43:35PM +, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> >
> > Use alloc_workqueue() to allocate the workqueue instead of
> > create_singlethread_workqueue() since the latter is deprecated and is
> > scheduled
> > for removal.
>
> I can't see any indication of that in the cod
