> On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 23:41 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>
> > Assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed by two packets, the last one
> > must not contain padding, is my understanding correct?
>
> Yes. More generally, assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed of *any
> number of* packets, the
On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 23:41 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed by two packets, the last one
> must not contain padding, is my understanding correct?
Yes. More generally, assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed of *any
number of* packets, the last one must
>
> On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 23:07 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Do not try to aggregate packets in a A-MSDU frame if max_tx_fragments
> > or max_amsdu_subframes is set to 1.
>
> Yeah that seems valid.
>
> > Moreover take into account
> > tail padding added on the first frame into flow backlog
On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 23:07 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> Do not try to aggregate packets in a A-MSDU frame if max_tx_fragments
> or max_amsdu_subframes is set to 1.
Yeah that seems valid.
> Moreover take into account
> tail padding added on the first frame into flow backlog if
>
Do not try to aggregate packets in a A-MSDU frame if max_tx_fragments
or max_amsdu_subframes is set to 1. Moreover take into account
tail padding added on the first frame into flow backlog if
ieee80211_amsdu_realloc_pad routine on the second frame fails.
This patch fixes a kernel freeze that
