Bjorn Andersson writes:
> On Wed 10 May 00:27 PDT 2017, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
>> On 5/10/2017 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>
>> > AFAICT this never worked, as it seems I did the rework in SMD while we
>> > tried to figure out the dependency issues we had with moving to SMD. So
>> > v4.9 t
On Wed 10 May 00:27 PDT 2017, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 5/10/2017 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 08 May 23:17 PDT 2017, Kalle Valo wrote:
> >
> > > Bjorn Andersson writes:
> > >
> > > > The SMD channel is not the primary WCNSS channel and must explicitly be
> > > > closed as the
On 5/10/2017 1:03 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Mon 08 May 23:17 PDT 2017, Kalle Valo wrote:
Bjorn Andersson writes:
The SMD channel is not the primary WCNSS channel and must explicitly be
closed as the device is removed, or the channel will already by open on
a subsequent probe call in e.g.
On Mon 08 May 23:17 PDT 2017, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Bjorn Andersson writes:
>
> > The SMD channel is not the primary WCNSS channel and must explicitly be
> > closed as the device is removed, or the channel will already by open on
> > a subsequent probe call in e.g. the case of reloading the kernel
Bjorn Andersson writes:
> The SMD channel is not the primary WCNSS channel and must explicitly be
> closed as the device is removed, or the channel will already by open on
> a subsequent probe call in e.g. the case of reloading the kernel module.
>
> This issue was introduced because I simplified
The SMD channel is not the primary WCNSS channel and must explicitly be
closed as the device is removed, or the channel will already by open on
a subsequent probe call in e.g. the case of reloading the kernel module.
This issue was introduced because I simplified the underlying SMD
implementation
