Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: let's wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure

2018-08-28 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:58 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:54:27PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:52 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > > Make wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure. This simplify code > > > a lot at cost of having bigger

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: let's wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure

2018-08-22 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 01:54:27PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:52 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > Make wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure. This simplify code > > a lot at cost of having bigger memory usage. However in most cases > > we have only few reg_rule's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: let's wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure

2018-08-22 Thread Johannes Berg
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 13:52 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > Make wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure. This simplify code > a lot at cost of having bigger memory usage. However in most cases > we have only few reg_rule's and when we have many like in iwlwifi > we do not save memory as we

[PATCH 1/2] cfg80211: let's wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure

2018-08-22 Thread Stanislaw Gruszka
Make wmm_rule be part of reg_rule structure. This simplify code a lot at cost of having bigger memory usage. However in most cases we have only few reg_rule's and when we have many like in iwlwifi we do not save memory as we allocate wmm_rule for each channel. Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka