Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: wilc1000: wilc_msgqueue.c: use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC

2015-09-09 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 12:36:38AM +0900, Chaehyun Lim wrote: > This patch use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC instead of WILC_MALLOC. > It is inside the spin lock region. > > Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim > --- Its not related to your patch, but while seeing your patch I thought

[PATCH 4/5] staging: wilc1000: wilc_msgqueue.c: use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC

2015-09-07 Thread Chaehyun Lim
This patch use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC instead of WILC_MALLOC. It is inside the spin lock region. Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim --- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: wilc1000: wilc_msgqueue.c: use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC

2015-09-07 Thread Tony Cho
On 2015년 09월 08일 00:36, Chaehyun Lim wrote: This patch use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC instead of WILC_MALLOC. It is inside the spin lock region. Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim --- drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_msgqueue.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [PATCH 4/5] staging: wilc1000: wilc_msgqueue.c: use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC

2015-09-07 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:23:07AM +0900, Tony Cho wrote: > > > On 2015년 09월 08일 00:36, Chaehyun Lim wrote: > >This patch use kmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC instead of WILC_MALLOC. > >It is inside the spin lock region. > > > >Signed-off-by: Chaehyun Lim > >--- > >