On 4/18/2017 10:55 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 10:53 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
Hi Arend,
Overall this looks good, and I've almost applied it - but I have a
question on this patch.
You have this list:
+ struct list_head sched_scan_req_list;
struct
On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 10:53 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> Overall this looks good, and I've almost applied it - but I have a
> question on this patch.
>
> You have this list:
>
> > + struct list_head sched_scan_req_list;
> > struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request __rcu
Hi Arend,
Overall this looks good, and I've almost applied it - but I have a
question on this patch.
You have this list:
> + struct list_head sched_scan_req_list;
> struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request __rcu *sched_scan_req;
but you kept this. In fact, it's even still *used*. I don't
This patch implements the idea to have multiple scheduled scan requests
running concurrently. It mainly illustrates how to deal with the incoming
request from user-space in terms of backward compatibility. In order to
use multiple scheduled scans user-space needs to provide a flag attribute
