On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:05 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
There is a possible issue with the use, or lack thereof of sk_refcnt and
sk_wmem_alloc in the wifi ack status functionality.
Specifically if a socket were to request acknowledgements, and the socket
were to have sk_refcnt drop to 0
On 09/11/14 09:06, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:05 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
There is a possible issue with the use, or lack thereof of sk_refcnt and
sk_wmem_alloc in the wifi ack status functionality.
Specifically if a socket were to request acknowledgements, and the
On 09/11/2014 02:38 AM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
On 09/11/14 09:06, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:05 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
There is a possible issue with the use, or lack thereof of sk_refcnt and
sk_wmem_alloc in the wifi ack status functionality.
Specifically if a
On 09/11/2014 12:06 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Wed, 2014-09-10 at 18:05 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
There is a possible issue with the use, or lack thereof of sk_refcnt and
sk_wmem_alloc in the wifi ack status functionality.
Specifically if a socket were to request acknowledgements, and
