On 4/5/2018 3:10 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Ulf Hansson writes:
On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo wrote:
Arend van Spriel writes:
If I get it right, you mean something like this:
mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
...
On 5 April 2018 at 15:10, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Ulf Hansson writes:
>
>> On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>> Arend van Spriel writes:
>>>
>> If I get it right, you mean something
Ulf Hansson writes:
> On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Arend van Spriel writes:
>>
> If I get it right, you mean something like this:
>
> mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
> ...
>
On 20 March 2018 at 10:55, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Arend van Spriel writes:
>
If I get it right, you mean something like this:
mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
...
broken-sg-support;
sd-head-align = 4;
Arend van Spriel writes:
>>> If I get it right, you mean something like this:
>>>
>>> mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
>>> ...
>>> broken-sg-support;
>>> sd-head-align = 4;
>>> sd-sgentry-align = 512;
>>>
>>> brcmf: wifi@1 {
>>>
Arend,
Agreed. Let's dismiss these patches.
Now I'm curious if I can get the information about DMA SG limitations
from MMC layer, I'll try to figure out something.
BTW, my specific setup (with default alignments) triggers kernel panic
(I see brcm_* in backtrace). It's better if I create separate
On 3/20/2018 8:58 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
Arend,
Also I am not sure if the broken-sg-support is still needed. We added that for
omap_hsmmc, but that has since changed to scatter-gather emulation so it might
not be needed anymore.
I can confirm it doesn't impact wifi performance in case
Arend,
>Also I am not sure if the broken-sg-support is still needed. We added that for
>omap_hsmmc, but that has since changed to scatter-gather emulation so it might
>not be needed anymore.
I can confirm it doesn't impact wifi performance in case of rk3288+ap6335.
But I still have to set
Arend,
I use RK3288-firefly, bcm4339 (ap6335).
Regards,
Alex
On 20 March 2018 at 06:16, Arend van Spriel
wrote:
> + Uffe
>
> On 3/19/2018 6:55 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> On 03/19/2018 07:10 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Arend,
>>> I appreciate
+ Uffe
On 3/19/2018 6:55 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 03/19/2018 07:10 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
Hi Arend,
I appreciate your response. In my opinion, it has nothing to do with
SDIO host, because it defines "quirks" in the driver itself.
It is not clear to me from your patch series
On 03/19/2018 07:10 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
> Hi Arend,
> I appreciate your response. In my opinion, it has nothing to do with
> SDIO host, because it defines "quirks" in the driver itself.
It is not clear to me from your patch series whether the problem is that:
- the SDIO device has a
Hi Arend,
I appreciate your response. In my opinion, it has nothing to do with
SDIO host, because it defines "quirks" in the driver itself.
If I get it right, you mean something like this:
mmc3: mmc@1c12000 {
...
broken-sg-support;
sd-head-align = 4;
sd-sgentry-align =
On 3/19/2018 2:40 AM, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
In case if the host has higher align requirements for SG items, allow
setting device-specific aligns for scatterlist items.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Roslyakov
---
In case if the host has higher align requirements for SG items, allow
setting device-specific aligns for scatterlist items.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Roslyakov
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm43xx-fmac.txt | 5 +
1 file changed, 5
14 matches
Mail list logo