Kalle Valo writes:
> From: Johannes Berg
>
> According to the spec, VHT doesn't exist in 2.4GHz.
>
> There are vendor extensions to allow a subset of VHT to work
> (notably 256-QAM), but since mac80211 doesn't support those
> advertising VHT
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 15:07 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>
> If many vendors need this support, then mac80211 appraoch would be
> good. If not, we should stick to driver approach.
Trying to do this in the driver gets practically impossible, so no, it
really should be done in mac80211 either
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:13:46PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> > On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>> >> Are these Broadcom IEs
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:13:46PM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> >> Are these Broadcom IEs documented somewhere? If yes,
> >> then its a matter of parsing them
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Valo, Kalle
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Johannes Berg writes:
>>>
On Thu,
On 04/26/2016 01:07 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
Johannes Berg writes:
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Valo, Kalle wrote:
> Johannes Berg writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
>>> The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I posted
>>> to fix mac80211, and at any rate,
Johannes Berg writes:
> On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>
>> The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I posted
>> to fix mac80211, and at any rate, even if the mac80211 patch isn't
>> applied, the ath10k driver works just fine in HT
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 08:15 -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
> The thing is, it actually works just fine with the patch I posted
> to fix mac80211, and at any rate, even if the mac80211 patch isn't
> applied, the ath10k driver works just fine in HT mode.
This patch has no implications on HT, and I
On 04/21/2016 06:17 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
From: Johannes Berg
According to the spec, VHT doesn't exist in 2.4GHz.
There are vendor extensions to allow a subset of VHT to work
(notably 256-QAM), but since mac80211 doesn't support those
advertising VHT capability on
From: Johannes Berg
According to the spec, VHT doesn't exist in 2.4GHz.
There are vendor extensions to allow a subset of VHT to work
(notably 256-QAM), but since mac80211 doesn't support those
advertising VHT capability on 2.4GHz leads to the behaviour
of reporting VHT
11 matches
Mail list logo