Hi,
Am 26.01.2018 um 16:05 schrieb Tejun Heo:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> Not that you mention it ... Honestly though, wifi connections break all
>> the time, so not sure you'd really want that. But anyway, that's what
>> we have.
> I'd be a lot h
Hello,
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 09:08:02AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Not that you mention it ... Honestly though, wifi connections break all
> the time, so not sure you'd really want that. But anyway, that's what
> we have.
I'd be a lot happier to remove WQ_MEM_RECLAIM from wireless drivers
to
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 14:26 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeah, that came up a couple years ago. IIRC, there wasn't a definite
> answer but the sentiment seemed that things like nfs over wireless
> should probably considered. No idea how serious that concern is.
Not that you mention it ... Honestly
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:01:26PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> I guess we should just ask Tejun :-)
>
> Tejun, the problem was a report that a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue is
> flushing another that isn't, and it turns out that lots of wireless
> drivers are using WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for some rea
I guess we should just ask Tejun :-)
Tejun, the problem was a report that a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue is
flushing another that isn't, and it turns out that lots of wireless
drivers are using WQ_MEM_RECLAIM for some reason.
Arend said:
> > > > Maybe a hint in the documentation, that a work item on
resending as it included html and got blocked from the list.
On 1/25/2018 7:21 PM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
Op 24 jan. 2018 11:46 schreef "Johannes Berg" mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net>>:
>
> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 10:39 +0100, Benjamin Beichler wrote:
>
> > sorry for introducing that error,
On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 10:39 +0100, Benjamin Beichler wrote:
> sorry for introducing that error, but I'm a bit confused by the
> workqueue documentation.
> My assumption was, that deleting hwsim radios is reclaiming memory, and
> since this queue does nothing else it would save/necessary to set thi
Hi Johannes,
sorry for introducing that error, but I'm a bit confused by the
workqueue documentation.
My assumption was, that deleting hwsim radios is reclaiming memory, and
since this queue does nothing else it would save/necessary to set this flag.
Maybe a hint in the documentation, that a work
From: Johannes Berg
We're obviously not part of a memory reclaim path, so don't set the flag.
This also causes a warning in check_flush_dependency() since we end up
in a code path that flushes a non-reclaim workqueue, and we shouldn't do
that if we were really part of reclaim.
Reported-by: syzb
