On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 12:13 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
>>>
>>> We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
>>> make
On 05/06/2016 12:13 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
make sure we are always in irq disable context, use dev_kfree_skb_irq
instead of kfree_skb is better
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
> make sure we are always in irq disable context, use dev_kfree_skb_irq
> instead of kfree_skb is better than dev_kfree_skb_any.
>
> This patch fix
On 05/06/2016 11:33 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
make sure we are always in irq disable context, use dev_kfree_skb_irq
instead of kfree_skb is better than dev_kfree_skb_any.
This patch fix below kernel warning:
[ 7612.095528]
We can't use kfree_skb in irq disable context, because spin_lock_irqsave
make sure we are always in irq disable context, use dev_kfree_skb_irq
instead of kfree_skb is better than dev_kfree_skb_any.
This patch fix below kernel warning:
[ 7612.095528] [ cut here ]
[