> Also I don't see the array issue. @relative_rssi_5g_pref with s8
> value seems same as @rssi_adjust with (band=5g, s8 value) packed
> together. Or am I missing something here.
Jouni is arguing that if you can specify which band to adjust, you
might want to adjust more than one band - and need a
On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 20:52 +, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> > I think between that (unless we add that, we could technically
> > extend flag attributes to allow them being an int as well, or add a
> > new one) and the fact that the device may not support different
> > relative RSSI matches in diffe
On 20-12-2016 21:52, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 11:06 +, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
>>> Maybe the nl80211.h description was not clear enough, but the
>>> comments in cfg80211.h should be quite clear on how this was
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 10:56:51AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 11:06 +, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> > Maybe the nl80211.h description was not clear enough, but the
> > comments in cfg80211.h should be quite clear on how this was designed
> > to work at the implementation lev
On Thu, 2016-12-15 at 11:06 +, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:56:55PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > Regarding reusing attributes, we have (for the BSS selection thing)
> > the attribute NL80211_BSS_SELECT_ATTR_RSSI_ADJUST, which is really
> > quite similar to your
> > new
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 04:56:55PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Regarding reusing attributes, we have (for the BSS selection thing) the
> attribute NL80211_BSS_SELECT_ATTR_RSSI_ADJUST, which is really quite
> similar to your new NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_RELATIVE_RSSI_5G_PREF since
> while connected
Ok... this is getting complicated :)
Regarding reusing attributes, we have (for the BSS selection thing) the
attribute NL80211_BSS_SELECT_ATTR_RSSI_ADJUST, which is really quite
similar to your new NL80211_ATTR_SCHED_SCAN_RELATIVE_RSSI_5G_PREF since
while connected (which BSS_SELECT_ATTR_* assumes
On 8-12-2016 18:52, Malinen, Jouni wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
>>>
What about Arend's comment regarding this f
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 09:03:23PM +0100, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
> >
> >> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with
> >> the
> >>
On 2-12-2016 22:59, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> From: vamsi krishna
>
> Enhance sched scan to support option of finding a better BSS while in
> connected state. Firmware scans the medium and reports when it finds a
> known BSS which has better RSSI than the current connected BSS. New
> attributes to s
On 7-12-2016 10:33, Vamsi, Krishna wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
>
>> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with the
>> BSS selection offload configuration?
>>
>> Do you think there's any ability to shar
> -Original Message-
> From: Johannes Berg [mailto:johan...@sipsolutions.net]
> What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping with the
> BSS selection offload configuration?
>
> Do you think there's any ability to share attributes/functionality?
Hi Johannes,
I thin
> v2: address comments from Luca, Arend, and Johannes
What about Arend's comment regarding this functionality overlapping
with the BSS selection offload configuration?
Do you think there's any ability to share attributes/functionality?
johannes
From: vamsi krishna
Enhance sched scan to support option of finding a better BSS while in
connected state. Firmware scans the medium and reports when it finds a
known BSS which has better RSSI than the current connected BSS. New
attributes to specify the relative RSSI (compared to the current BSS
14 matches
Mail list logo
