There is dupliceted 'if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))' entry that couses
we do not perform proper register initaliztion for RT6352 (MT7620 SOCs).
Reported-by: Tomislav Požega
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka
---
drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2800lib.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertio
On 09/10/2018, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> There is dupliceted 'if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))' entry that couses
> we do not perform proper register initaliztion for RT6352 (MT7620 SOCs).
>
> Reported-by: Tomislav Požega
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:27:31AM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> On 09/10/2018, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > There is dupliceted 'if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))' entry that couses
> > we do not perform proper register initaliztion for RT6352 (MT7620 SOCs).
> >
> > Reported-by: Tomislav Požega
>
Hi Stanislaw,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 09:14:52AM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:27:31AM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> > On 09/10/2018, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > > There is dupliceted 'if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT6352))' entry that couses
> > > we do not perform prope
Hello
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 02:06:58PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > https://github.com/psyborg55/linux/commit/24b46d482590a87553df1de0b5c8032f363cb7cf
> > > ?
> > >
> > > using this code to determine 7620 soc
> > >
> > > if (rt == RT5390 && rt2x00_is_soc(rt2x00dev))
> > > rt =
case 1:
} else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x0404);
rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG1, 0x00080606);
rt2800_register_write(rt
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> case 1:
>
> } else if (rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5390) ||
> rt2x00_rt(rt2x00dev, RT5392)) {
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev, TX_SW_CFG0, 0x0404);
> rt2800_register_write(rt2x00dev,
ok, that is strange. do you see any performance differences without
TX_SW_CFG regs? iperf test is a good pointer.
this was a problem on xiaomi mini with old DD trunk builds on 4.4
kernel and LEDE builds from last year. i ain't got no chance to try
this on 18.06. which device you tried this on? if
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> ok, that is strange. do you see any performance differences without
> TX_SW_CFG regs? iperf test is a good pointer.
>
> this was a problem on xiaomi mini with old DD trunk builds on 4.4
> kernel and LEDE builds from last year. i ain't
so this is RX test where I assume your 7265 card is sending data. is
that HT20 or HT40 mode and do you get regression on TX too?
can you try same case 2 test but with registers set to:
TX_SW_CFG0, 0x0401
TX_SW_CFG1, 0x000C
TX_SW_CFG2, 0x (or 0x000C0408)
did you ever notice any tx
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 02:39:25PM +0200, Tom Psyborg wrote:
> so this is RX test where I assume your 7265 card is sending data. is
> that HT20 or HT40 mode and do you get regression on TX too?
>
> can you try same case 2 test but with registers set to:
>
> TX_SW_CFG0, 0x0401
> TX_SW_CFG1, 0x
11 matches
Mail list logo
