On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 18:27 +0200, Alexander Wetzel wrote:
> > This seems a bit weird - we know a likely dangerous thing is happening
> > and only print an info message? Why not just prevent this in the first
> > place?
>
> The next version will upgrade that to a warning.
Maybe make it rate limi
Am 28.08.18 um 10:48 schrieb Johannes Berg:
> On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 12:42 +0200, Alexander Wetzel wrote:
>>
>> +/* PTK only using key ID 0 needs special handling on rekey */
>> +if (new_key && sta && ptk0rekey) {
>> +local = old_key->local;
>> +sdata = old_key->sdata
On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 12:42 +0200, Alexander Wetzel wrote:
>
> + /* PTK only using key ID 0 needs special handling on rekey */
> + if (new_key && sta && ptk0rekey) {
> + local = old_key->local;
> + sdata = old_key->sdata;
> +
> + /* Stop TX till we are o
Rekeying PTK keys without "Extended Key ID for Individually Addressed
Frames" did use a procedure not suitable to replace in-use keys and
could caused the following issues:
1) Freeze caused by incoming packets:
If the local STA installed the key prior to the remote STA we still
had the ol
