On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 14:46 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> I already have the 4-way-hs stuff rebased with modified ATTR_PMK
> description and additional length check in nl80211 for it. Jouni
> commented on that already in 4-way-hs patch.
Cool.
> > Do you want to pick that up? I probably can't
On 28-4-2017 14:02, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
>> I tested the 4-way-hs (both Personal and 802.1X) with boolean
>> parameter similar to what is proposed in the patch for roaming
>> "cfg80211/nl80211: add authorized flag to roaming event" and it works
>> fine. So I can extend it for use in connect re
> I tested the 4-way-hs (both Personal and 802.1X) with boolean
> parameter similar to what is proposed in the patch for roaming
> "cfg80211/nl80211: add authorized flag to roaming event" and it works
> fine. So I can extend it for use in connect result. Just had one
> issue regarding the type, ie
On 26-4-2017 9:20, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 20:56 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>> You might, but not about this ;-) The other approach I had in mind is
>> to only pass the flag for drivers with 4-way-hs support. In that case
>> wpa_supp also has to check that to determine w
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 20:56 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
> You might, but not about this ;-) The other approach I had in mind is
> to only pass the flag for drivers with 4-way-hs support. In that case
> wpa_supp also has to check that to determine whether the flag should
> be taken into accoun
On 25-4-2017 20:36, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 20:34 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
+ (cr->port_state != CONTROL_PORT_STATE_UNAUTHORIZED
&&
+ nla_put_flag(msg, NL80211_ATTR_PORT_AUTHORIZED)) ||
(cr->req_ie &&
>>>
>>> This doesn't reall
On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 20:34 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > > + (cr->port_state != CONTROL_PORT_STATE_UNAUTHORIZED
> > > &&
> > > + nla_put_flag(msg, NL80211_ATTR_PORT_AUTHORIZED)) ||
> > > (cr->req_ie &&
> > >
> >
> > This doesn't really make sense - why does unspecified equal
On 25-4-2017 16:40, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 22:01 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>
>> I have been working on 4-way handshake offloading and one of the
>> things discussed was the addition of PORT_AUTHORIZED flag. So
>> this is what I came up with, but I suppose wpa_supplicant
On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 22:01 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> I have been working on 4-way handshake offloading and one of the
> things discussed was the addition of PORT_AUTHORIZED flag. So
> this is what I came up with, but I suppose wpa_supplicant wants
> to know whether it can expect this attri
When the driver supports offloading of the PTK/GTK handshakes
completion of that during connect changes the layer 2 control
port state to authorized. This patch allows the driver to pass
that state in cfg80211_connect_done() resulting in adding the
new flag NL80211_ATTR_PORT_AUTHORIZED in the NL802
10 matches
Mail list logo
