Re: [RFC 1/3] cfg80211: Make pre-CAC results valid only for ETSI domain

2017-01-31 Thread Thiagarajan, Vasanthakumar
On Thursday 26 January 2017 03:04 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> +/* Should we apply the grace period during beaconing >> interface >> + * shutdown also? >> + */ >> +cfg80211_sched_dfs_chan_update(rdev); > > It might make some sense, say if hostapd cra

Re: [RFC 1/3] cfg80211: Make pre-CAC results valid only for ETSI domain

2017-01-26 Thread Johannes Berg
> + /* Should we apply the grace period during beaconing > interface > +  * shutdown also? > +  */ > + cfg80211_sched_dfs_chan_update(rdev); It might make some sense, say if hostapd crashes and you restart it automatically or something? >   ret

[RFC 1/3] cfg80211: Make pre-CAC results valid only for ETSI domain

2017-01-25 Thread Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
DFS requirement for ETSI domain (section 4.7.1.4 in ETSI EN 301 893 V1.8.1) is the only one which explicitly states that once DFS channel is marked as available afer the CAC, this channel will remain in available state even moving to a different operating channel. But the same is not explicitly sta