On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 11:42 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2015-06-17 11:39, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> > Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> >> This is what I have with use_chanctx=1
> >> Jun 17 06:57:54 dell6430 kernel: [53297.753256] xxx ath_calcrxfilter
> >> filter: 0x207
> >>
> >> 0x00080 is for pr
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> The filter is intended to be global in the mac80211 API.
> Treating it as per channel-context inside the driver is a bug.
Agreed.
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More m
On 2015-06-17 11:39, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
>> This is what I have with use_chanctx=1
>> Jun 17 06:57:54 dell6430 kernel: [53297.753256] xxx ath_calcrxfilter
>> filter: 0x207
>>
>> 0x00080 is for probe_req
>
> Ok, so the probe_req filter is set before actually initia
Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> This is what I have with use_chanctx=1
> Jun 17 06:57:54 dell6430 kernel: [53297.753256] xxx ath_calcrxfilter
> filter: 0x207
>
> 0x00080 is for probe_req
Ok, so the probe_req filter is set before actually initiating
RoC - this appears to be the current design in wpa_
On 17 June 2015 at 11:00, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> mac80211 calculates the filter per hw, not per channel context or per
>> vif. Setting it for the current channel context only would mean it might
>> be applied to the wrong context. This patch fixes that issue.
>> I agree
Felix Fietkau wrote:
> mac80211 calculates the filter per hw, not per channel context or per
> vif. Setting it for the current channel context only would mean it might
> be applied to the wrong context. This patch fixes that issue.
> I agree that it might be a useful optimization to selectively app
On 2015-06-17 10:20, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
>> mac80211 configure rxfilter per HW,
>> so we don't need this per channel.
>>
>> This fix problem when chanctx used and
>> ath9k allocate new ath_chanctx. Then we loose
>> rxfilter configuration.
>>
>> Eg. during p2p_find (wh
Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> mac80211 configure rxfilter per HW,
> so we don't need this per channel.
>
> This fix problem when chanctx used and
> ath9k allocate new ath_chanctx. Then we loose
> rxfilter configuration.
>
> Eg. during p2p_find (when use_chanctx=1) during
> remain on channel, driver cr
On 2015-06-17 07:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> mac80211 configure rxfilter per HW,
> so we don't need this per channel.
>
> This fix problem when chanctx used and
> ath9k allocate new ath_chanctx. Then we loose
> rxfilter configuration.
>
> Eg. during p2p_find (when use_chanctx=1) during
> remain
mac80211 configure rxfilter per HW,
so we don't need this per channel.
This fix problem when chanctx used and
ath9k allocate new ath_chanctx. Then we loose
rxfilter configuration.
Eg. during p2p_find (when use_chanctx=1) during
remain on channel, driver create new ath_chanctx
with incorrect rxfil
10 matches
Mail list logo