On 22/05/17 23:02, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
>
> On 22-5-2017 14:09, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 5/22/2017 12:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi,
I encountered this splat with 4.12-RC2.
>>>
>>> Ugh, yeah, I should've
On 23-5-2017 9:22, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:19 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>>
>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
>>
>> Thought about something like this after sending the email. So there
>> are two call sites. One for scheduled scan
On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:19 +0200, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
>
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held() && !lockdep_rtnl_is_held());
>
> Thought about something like this after sending the email. So there
> are two call sites. One for scheduled scan results notification and
> one in scheduled
On 22-5-2017 23:04, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi Arend,
>
> Sorry, I forgot that the original message wasn't Cc'ed to the wireless
> list, only netdev.
That explains. Not subscribed to that.
>> +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
>> @@ -322,9 +322,7 @@ static void cfg80211_del_sched_scan_req(struct
>>
Hi Arend,
Sorry, I forgot that the original message wasn't Cc'ed to the wireless
list, only netdev.
> +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
> @@ -322,9 +322,7 @@ static void cfg80211_del_sched_scan_req(struct
> cfg80211_regi
> {
> struct cfg80211_sched_scan_request *pos;
>
> - ASSERT_RTNL();
On 22-5-2017 14:09, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 5/22/2017 12:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I encountered this splat with 4.12-RC2.
>>
>> Ugh, yeah, I should've seen that in the review.
>>
>> Arend, please take a look
On 5/22/2017 12:57 PM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi,
I encountered this splat with 4.12-RC2.
Ugh, yeah, I should've seen that in the review.
Arend, please take a look at this. cfg80211_sched_scan_results() cannot
sleep, so you can't
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 12:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered this splat with 4.12-RC2.
Ugh, yeah, I should've seen that in the review.
Arend, please take a look at this. cfg80211_sched_scan_results() cannot
sleep, so you can't rtnl_lock() in there. Looks like you can
