Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Ben Greear
I have a variant of the ath10k 10.1 firmware that puts all frames, including management, over the normal htt packet transport. This has worked fine for many kernels, but for reasons that currently escape me, the patch below breaks this firmware. On air, I see corrupted probe responses, seems t

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/01/2016 11:01 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: If someone has any idea of why this patch might trigger it, please let me know. I'll keep digging in the meantime... Revert "mac80211: don't advertise NL80211_FEATURE_FULL_AP_CLIENT_STATE" With a sufficiently recent hostapd/wpa_supplicant, t

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/01/2016 11:53 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: Could easily be that others are corrupted too, but since probe resp is bad, the association will not proceed. makes sense. Heh, I spent 4 days tracking this down, so I wanted to be precise in m

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Johannes Berg
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: >  > Could easily be that others are corrupted too, but since probe resp > is bad, the association will not proceed. makes sense. > Heh, I spent 4 days tracking this down, so I wanted to be precise in > my bug report :) Ahrg, ouch. Sorry about

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/01/2016 11:53 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: Could easily be that others are corrupted too, but since probe resp is bad, the association will not proceed. makes sense. Heh, I spent 4 days tracking this down, so I wanted to be precise in m

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-01 Thread Johannes Berg
> If someone has any idea of why this patch might trigger it, please > let me know. > I'll keep digging in the meantime... >  >  Revert "mac80211: don't advertise NL80211_FEATURE_FULL_AP_CLIENT_STATE" > With a sufficiently recent hostapd/wpa_supplicant, the patch will cause a station entry t

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-02 Thread Michal Kazior
On 1 September 2016 at 22:52, Ben Greear wrote: > On 09/01/2016 11:53 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: >>> >>> Could easily be that others are corrupted too, but since probe resp >>> is bad, the association will not proceed. >> >> makes sense. >> >>>

Re: Ath10k probe response error related to mac80211 commit.

2016-09-02 Thread Ben Greear
On 09/02/2016 05:09 AM, Michal Kazior wrote: On 1 September 2016 at 22:52, Ben Greear wrote: On 09/01/2016 11:53 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 11:23 -0700, Ben Greear wrote: Could easily be that others are corrupted too, but since probe resp is bad, the association will no