Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-05-25 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 24 May 2016 at 21:49, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > Looking into the firmware code it turns out that the DOWN command brings > down the entire stack iso single interface. This seems specific for some > firmware branches so we have to find a better solution. Hante and

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-05-24 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 23-3-2016 20:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 23 March 2016 at 11:44, Arend Van Spriel > wrote: >> On 23-3-2016 9:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 22 March 2016 at 21:24, Arend van Spriel >>> wrote: On 22-3-2016 7:36, Rafał

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-05-06 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 23 March 2016 at 20:13, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 23 March 2016 at 11:44, Arend Van Spriel > wrote: >> On 23-3-2016 9:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 22 March 2016 at 21:24, Arend van Spriel >>> wrote: On

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-23 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 23 March 2016 at 11:44, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > On 23-3-2016 9:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> On 22 March 2016 at 21:24, Arend van Spriel >> wrote: >>> On 22-3-2016 7:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote: Hi, any ideas / help regarding this

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-23 Thread Arend Van Spriel
On 23-3-2016 9:47, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 22 March 2016 at 21:24, Arend van Spriel > wrote: >> On 22-3-2016 7:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> On 3 March 2016 at 23:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: brcmfmac in general is not capable of removing

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-23 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 22 March 2016 at 21:24, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 22-3-2016 7:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> On 3 March 2016 at 23:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> brcmfmac in general is not capable of removing interfaces. If you take >>> a look at

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-22 Thread Arend van Spriel
On 22-3-2016 7:36, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 3 March 2016 at 23:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> brcmfmac in general is not capable of removing interfaces. If you take >> a look at brcmf_cfg80211_del_iface implementation, you'll see it >> returns -EOPNOTSUPP (except for p2p

Re: Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-22 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 3 March 2016 at 23:37, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > brcmfmac in general is not capable of removing interfaces. If you take > a look at brcmf_cfg80211_del_iface implementation, you'll see it > returns -EOPNOTSUPP (except for p2p interfaces). > > However there is problem in handling

Problem with brcmfmac removing extra interface

2016-03-03 Thread Rafał Miłecki
Hi, brcmfmac in general is not capable of removing interfaces. If you take a look at brcmf_cfg80211_del_iface implementation, you'll see it returns -EOPNOTSUPP (except for p2p interfaces). However there is problem in handling NL80211_CMD_STOP_AP (with the brcmf_cfg80211_stop_ap callback).